Yours makes no sense.Blocks100 wrote:Mine makes more sense.
The actress that played her was apparently only ever contracted for seven episodes as she had commitments on another project. The show runners obviously kept that pretty quiet though.I_R wrote:I was assuming that was going to happen as well. Maybe not easy to pass off a host outside the park. I did wonder if it was creative reasons with the actress rather than something in the script. She seems to have been replaced by the young lass straight away, but neither part is something you'd imagine an actor being that enthused by. I wondered if the data that the board is trying to get out is recordings of what guests have done rather than technology. Some freaky shit going on.
g.man wrote:
g.man wrote:Heh. This right here is a humdinger of a theory.
g.man wrote:
I thought it was her too actually. She seemed quite in control of the bandits I thought.poprock wrote:I actually though she might be Wyatt, but Teddy doesn’t recognise her. Then again … given the way hosts can be repurposed for different roles, there’s no need for ‘now’ Wyatt to be the same host Teddy remembered as Wyatt.g.man wrote:
three1ne wrote:This is starting to get interesting and I regret having one eye on my phone whilst watching. Why is Wyatt so important to MiB? Is Wyatt a rogue robot?
Blocks100 wrote:I can't fucking wait unit MiB and William appear on screen together so all those internet theorists cry themselves to sleep.
Blocks100 wrote:You subscribe to the theory that they are one and the same then? Okaaaaay. If that gives you a touch of the smarts, that's fine cowboy, chew on that rind.
I used to think this thread was all about pandering to your baser instincts. Now I understand It doesn't cater to your lower self, it reveals your deepest self; it shows you who you really are.
g.man wrote:No need for that gonz.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!