Armitage_Shankburn wrote:Is there a rake? No P2P thing we can set up between us?
acemuzzy wrote:Cba online, but a live stock I'm in fo sho. Will obviously showboat just to mess with SG's head.
Gonz, your Monday things still happening? We moved classes around so I'm much freer than I was, so could do that one of the next few weeks of we line it up?!? Quite fancy a game after all this chat!
acemuzzy wrote:Cba online, but a live stock I'm in fo sho. Will obviously showboat just to mess with SG's head. Gonz, your Monday things still happening? We moved classes around so I'm much freer than I was, so could do that one of the next few weeks of we line it up?!? Quite fancy a game after all this chat!
acemuzzy wrote:It's hard to do rigorous statistical analysis with hand histories, as you don't see things that got folded etc. I'm also not sure what the right analysis be (though I am tempted to give it a go).
The one time a matter hand history was leaked showed actual cheating at absolute poker. And at ultimate poker. So let's not say these things are impossible.
I also have zero trust in the gaming industry as a whole. The industry is built on having an edge. Foolish to dismiss the chance of corruption in gaming commissions etc.
In about two hours of poker, couple of hundred hands, the number of strong hands and rubber beats was absurd. I know the pace is different, but this was five handed, and actual five handed poker would have way way less action. And guess what, action is the thing that makes them money. Or feels naive to say there's no chance of anything suss happening.
It also seems easy enough to code that way, maybe you do it less at the higher stakes tables where you have better players.
I got some free tickets. One was a $0.50 buy in. Three have. Prize is $3 cos it's randomised. First hand guess all in pre-flop, other player has 56os to my ATs. Hits trip gives to my pair of aces. Like who the fuck goes all in like that, with those cards. Obviously some idiots do, it's not proof of anything in isolation, bit the volume of it throughout has shot my credibility, whatever you may say.
Probably better to assume it matches the probability.acemuzzy wrote:Yeah indeed. And that will skew it to cases where the fishing trip hits. Could assume fold = not hit though...
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!