It's a tactic, but it's a pretty short term one. You don't build up a loyal audience through just being contrarian, you sell a few more issues of the specific product you are being contrarian in. I wouldn't presume that media companies are being contrarian for the sake of it, some certainly are, but there's certainly an awareness in at least some parts of the media that being contrarian isn't a sustainable business model.Lord_Griff wrote:Yes, contrarian media drives print media sales.
Obviously some online presence would be good, but there's something to be said for wiriting for print, even today. I wrote a piece for Kotaku UK last week and now it's probably already on about page 7 of their site, never to be seen again. Anything in Edge has a sense of permanence. I would guess they sell about 15k a month these days, which isn't a big number, but something written in there might actually be read and appreciated more than something that pops up on a biggish site for a day or two and then sinks without trace.LivDiv wrote:On paper yes but this is Future. If they were money smart they would still have a site, or team up with a site like Polygon or Kotaku or even mainstream media to publish Edge guest reviews and features. No offense to Jon here any of the other writers but the content is sat on the bottom shelf of Smith's.
That may be true with a review. But an opinion piece will generally just disappear and no one's likely to go searching for it. It's almost preferable to be on a smaller or more focused site in that respect, where it may at least hang around on the front page for longer, or people may go looking through the archives.retroking1981 wrote:Do you know how many hits your article for Kotaku had? That'll be there forever whereas that issue of edge will be in select houses of buyers. As a buyer of games in sales long after their release, I often check sites for old reviews. In that respect it doesn't matter if it's on page 1 or page 1000 of a site, I still have access.
Blocks100 wrote:I know, I've already buried all my back issues in a time capsule in the back yard so future generations can enjoy them.
Blocks100 wrote:I know, I've already buried all my back issues in a time capsule in the back yard so future generations can enjoy them.
Like Scrooge McDuck, but with magazines.Kara_Jane_Adams wrote:Because I still dip in and out of them.
retroking1981 wrote:Do you know how many hits your article for Kotaku had?
That'll be there forever whereas that issue of edge will be in select houses of buyers.
As a buyer of games in sales long after their release, I often check sites for old reviews. In that respect it doesn't matter if it's on page 1 or page 1000 of a site, I still have access.
JonB wrote:TBH I don't know if you're not supposed to say, and I haven't mentioned it anywhere else. But since no one ever comes here I thought it would be fine.
regmcfly wrote:Love if you could slide a copy of the edge style guide over for a perusal
I remember when me and kaz went drinking with Nathan Brown he mentioned
Rule 1) talk about something in the game / mechanics by the end of paragraph 1
Rule 2) the use of we
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!