You can't get hold of them for less than a million pounds. That good enough?n0face wrote:I feel I might need to come up with a valid reason to stop my children having them.
n0face wrote:Are they like skylanders?
JonB wrote:So they let you access a load of stuff that could have just been in the game in the first place?
Not quite sure how that works out as enhancing.
regmcfly wrote:
Toad is the best use of one so far. But then KINOPIO is the best ever so makes sense
n0face wrote:I still don't get what they are.
Not really. Unless you want to wait a few extra years for every game to come out.WorKid wrote:All DLC ever could all have just been in the game in the first place. As could all sequels actually.So they let you access a load of stuff that could have just been in the game in the first place? Not quite sure how that works out as enhancing.
JonB wrote:Not really. Unless you want to wait a few extra years for every game to come out.WorKid wrote:All DLC ever could all have just been in the game in the first place. As could all sequels actually.So they let you access a load of stuff that could have just been in the game in the first place? Not quite sure how that works out as enhancing.
Anyway, whether it's there from the start or added later, you don't need toys to unlock DLC, unless it's designed that way. If I got some DLC for a game but it said I could only play it if I went and bought a Mars Bar first, I wouldn't say the Mars Bar was game enhancing.
The DLC itself is game enhancing, regardless of how you get it. But having to buy something extra to get it isn't a selling point, it's an extra obstacle.What if you could only unlock the DLC via a code? Would the code be game enhancing? That's basically what it is, a digital key in a physical form that is also collectable and (opinions vary) look cool on a shelf.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!