JonB wrote:I only ever really played San Andreas a great deal. Avoided IV because it just sounded like it was trying too hard to build up a proper story, and that seems like a misunderstanding of what GTA is all about. The main draw of GTA has to be its hedonism, in the most pessimistic sense of running riot and causing destruction precisely because there's no deeper meaning to the world - it's just a hotch potch of popular culture references. The more it tries to inject meaning through characters and story the more it loses that one truly satirical point IMO.
revelthedog wrote:Never played it. Never got excited about it. Probably because I have no soul.
RamSteelwood wrote:the multiplayer on GTAIV was potentially amazing and generated some massive LOLS. Â but it faded away quickly for me for two main reasons: 1. the PC version quickly became a vile den of hacks and cheats 2. by the time i'd opened steam, launched the game, logged into rockstar, game booted, logged into windows live, had to load the single player game, then get on the mobile phone, then switch to multiplayer, then try to find a game...ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
n0face wrote:The mp had so much potential and could be a laugh but if they just had decent third person shooting it would be brilliant. There's just no skill, tension or fun in the way it is now.
n0face wrote:That's great if everyone else does,
Coopers Green wrote:I got bored of SR2, but SR3 had me giggling at times.ÂDark Soldier wrote:But I hated Saint's Row 2.
It's fun. Remember THAT stuff, GTA?!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!