davyK wrote:The physical forces involved there are incredible - that steelwork folded like it was made of tin foil. Shows how much of an engineering achievement bridges are.
GooberTheHat wrote:I don't imagine they have much tolerance for lateral forces.The physical forces involved there are incredible - that steelwork folded like it was made of tin foil. Shows how much of an engineering achievement bridges are.
Diluted Dante wrote:My personal preference for supporting bridges is not to drive boats into them.
LivDiv wrote:Theres a question on design though right? A boat crashing into a support isnt a completely outlandish situation to consider.
Andrew Barr, an expert in civil and structural engineering at the University of Sheffield, said that “the video doesn’t show any obvious structural deficiencies with the bridge, but it will not have been designed to survive a head-on collision with such a large vessel”.
He added:
Bridges in shipping lanes are sometimes designed with strong, stout piers, or additional protective structures around the piers to prevent ships from coming into contact with the bridge structure.
It doesn’t appear that the Key Bridge had either of these features, although it is also very likely that the size and design of the vessels passing under the bridge has changed considerably since it was completed in 1977.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!