afgavinstan wrote:https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/09/05/exclusive-bbc-comedy-shows-appear-overwhelmingly-biased-against/
Counting jokes now fucking lmaoooooo
tigersgogrrr wrote:You would need a comparison of when Labour were in power too.
afgavinstan wrote:My problem is I couldn't give a hoot about bias or whatever. These shows are just doing what they've always done, poked fun at whoever is in power. To try and paint it as the beeb caught in the act, or that it's in any way an EXCLUSIVE ALL CAPS, is laughable in and of itself.
You're not wrong at all. Joke count / language used would absolutely be reasonable ways of doing this properly.Minnesänger wrote:tigersgogrrr wrote:You would need a comparison of when Labour were in power too.afgavinstan wrote:My problem is I couldn't give a hoot about bias or whatever. These shows are just doing what they've always done, poked fun at whoever is in power. To try and paint it as the beeb caught in the act, or that it's in any way an EXCLUSIVE ALL CAPS, is laughable in and of itself.
Aye, it’s certainly a poor “study”.
Just saying joke counting ain’t a bad method, that’s all.
afgavinstan wrote:My problem is I couldn't give a hoot about bias or whatever. These shows are just doing what they've always done, poked fun at whoever is in power. To try and paint it as the beeb caught in the act, or that it's in any way an EXCLUSIVE ALL CAPS, is laughable in and of itself.
acemuzzy wrote:afgavinstan wrote:My problem is I couldn't give a hoot about bias or whatever. These shows are just doing what they've always done, poked fun at whoever is in power. To try and paint it as the beeb caught in the act, or that it's in any way an EXCLUSIVE ALL CAPS, is laughable in and of itself.
Well the accusation is that they haven't, and bias is at play. So surely disproving that (e.g. evidence of what happened under Labour) is useful?
afgavinstan wrote:https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/09/05/exclusive-bbc-comedy-shows-appear-overwhelmingly-biased-against/
Counting jokes now fucking lmaoooooo
A week later the May 29 episode featured no fewer than 27 jokes about Mr Johnson's chief adviser Dominic Cummings after his visit to Durham during lockdown. Hislop suggested that Mr Cummings “should resign” on three occasions.
monkey wrote:acemuzzy wrote:afgavinstan wrote:My problem is I couldn't give a hoot about bias or whatever. These shows are just doing what they've always done, poked fun at whoever is in power. To try and paint it as the beeb caught in the act, or that it's in any way an EXCLUSIVE ALL CAPS, is laughable in and of itself.
Well the accusation is that they haven't, and bias is at play. So surely disproving that (e.g. evidence of what happened under Labour) is useful?
No because it probably will be less for Labour because they (and no other government of right or left) ever got themselves into a mess like Brexit.
acemuzzy wrote:But the counterargument is that that's subjective. That Brexit is a glorious, democratic reclaiming of sovereignty. And hence not at all deserving of comic mirth. That isn't the side of the argument I'd be on, but is hard to totally objectively counter.
acemuzzy wrote:In their eyes: yes
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!