acemuzzy wrote:Money to be made for security firms. I'm sure Trump & friends don't Kow any of those either.
Supreme Court will revisit the issue later, after Trump has appointed someone to the court. I don't think it's at all settled.Diluted Dante wrote:They will be subject to legal challanges, and courts have consistently struck down voter ID laws.
Yossarian wrote:I'm not sure that the first sentence is due to the second.
Huge tax cuts and half a trillion of proposed govt spending is something a lot of people can get very rich from. I'm sure Wall Street is delighted. Whether or not he can reverse the long-term economic malaise that got him elected is something else.Dinostar77 wrote:Dow Jones up beyond 20,000 points for the first time in its history. A lot of faith in Trump by the business sector.
pantyfire wrote:I'm loving every day of this so far.
regmcfly wrote:This will tip the balance 5-4 to republicans. Obamas pick was indeed blocked
I really don't understand enough about it, but I think the risk is getting people who ask what would the founding fathers do rather than being bigots. Looking for guidance from long dead slave owners opens up a lot of opportunities for badness.GooberTheHat wrote:I thought there was a good chance of 1 or 2 being replaced during this administration. Hopefully the old ones won't be as bigoted as the trump staff and will go against the party if they try and push through some horrendous laws.
I_R wrote:I really don't understand enough about it, but I think the risk is getting people who ask what would the founding fathers do rather than being bigots. Looking for guidance from long dead slave owners opens up a lot of opportunities for badness.GooberTheHat wrote:I thought there was a good chance of 1 or 2 being replaced during this administration. Hopefully the old ones won't be as bigoted as the trump staff and will go against the party if they try and push through some horrendous laws.
I do wonder, but I suppose there's an argument that you can just be strict about the constitution without being a bigot.GooberTheHat wrote:Same thing, no?I_R wrote:I really don't understand enough about it, but I think the risk is getting people who ask what would the founding fathers do rather than being bigots. Looking for guidance from long dead slave owners opens up a lot of opportunities for badness.GooberTheHat wrote:I thought there was a good chance of 1 or 2 being replaced during this administration. Hopefully the old ones won't be as bigoted as the trump staff and will go against the party if they try and push through some horrendous laws.
acemuzzy wrote:I'm interested to see how the Mexicans paying thing pans out. It's going be very oblique / indirect / well in the future / nor happen but not happen to late for Trump to care. I imagine.
Build wall. Renegotiate some elements of Nafta.acemuzzy wrote:I'm interested to see how the Mexicans paying thing pans out. It's going be very oblique / indirect / well in the future / nor happen but not happen to late for Trump to care. I imagine.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!