Skerret wrote:No sports coaching but plenty of teaching and I expect there will be commonalities, happy to chew.
Andy wrote:I don't have any formal qualifications, and probably don't have much to offer that others don't have more expertise in, but I'm happy to chip in my tuppenceworth.
tigerswiftly wrote:Daddy: I'd considered doing some UK Athletics training at some point. Not enjoying it then?
tigerswiftly wrote:Calling you Daddy feels weird, Daddy.
behaviourist cuntcockbeard wrote:I'm very old school with instruction method, strict adherence to the principle of demonstration, explanation, participation, interrogation. You kinda cover all learning methods and it gives a decent structure to the period of time
Childintime wrote:Na, it's all good. There's a lot of transferable skills with any kind of coaching, teaching and training.Andy wrote:I don't have any formal qualifications, and probably don't have much to offer that others don't have more expertise in, but I'm happy to chip in my tuppenceworth.
Wookienopants wrote:Hi, I'm a professional school sports coach delivering a wide variety of activities for ages 4-11 during the day and a group exercise instructor at the gym in the evening. Not forgetting running my martial arts school. More than happy to help with anything.
The Daddy wrote:Not enjoying it mainly because it's at the end of a long day in the middle of the week so generally can't be arsed by that point.tigerswiftly wrote:Daddy: I'd considered doing some UK Athletics training at some point. Not enjoying it then?
Skerret wrote:behaviourist cuntcockbeard wrote:I'm very old school with instruction method, strict adherence to the principle of demonstration, explanation, participation, interrogation. You kinda cover all learning methods and it gives a decent structure to the period of time
Of course, I even use it on occasion when social constructivist methods fail. I just think cocko is a cunt is all (I don't really).Vela wrote:I'm not advocating behaviourism, but even if you dislike it you have to be aware of it because it is based on real phenomena (conditioning, reinforcement, extinction). So you have to understand it in order to avoid doing it unintentionally. I'm currently writing an essay on Skinner's vs Glasser's theories. The latter makes far more sense if you want to develop thinkers rather than produce robots.Skerret wrote:behaviourist cuntcockbeard wrote:I'm very old school with instruction method, strict adherence to the principle of demonstration, explanation, participation, interrogation. You kinda cover all learning methods and it gives a decent structure to the period of time
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!