RedDave2 wrote:He counts as a memorable design. He has what, 4 words in the phantom menace? A cool design? Yep. A good character? Nah.
Yossarian wrote:Great design is absolutely part of making a great character.
He looked cool and menacing as fuck, that made him memorable, that made him a good character.
RedDave2 wrote:b0r1s wrote:The main crime is instantly forgettable characters. Complain all you want about the prequels George understood how to make memorable characters.
Hang about - who are the memorable characters in the prequels? I mean there is some nice designs of some of the bad guys but I could not call them memorable.
RedDave2 wrote:Yes, the tramp was shite.
Fucker didn't even have colour.
Seriously though, stop being silly. It's becoming a habit.
b0r1s wrote:@RedDave2 - Dooku, Mace Windu, Padme, Jar Jar, Anakin, Darth Maul, Qui Gon Jin, Sebulba and Watto all spring to mind without having to do a Google. The best character in Rogue One is the droid and I can't even recall his name. Hang on there's Madds... oh.
monkey wrote:Darth Maul was good comparatively. Yes, it's 80% character design but what a design. It does the work that Lucas' writing couldn't. He'd have been great with a few more lines, some more evil stuff to do and in a much better movie.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!