It's a bit of an odd one, since it's had a whole range of release dates in different places. I think it's best just to include it.ShabbyMcCrabby wrote:
It's up there. I think Lucy would be mine.Aaroncupboard wrote:Worst film of the year for me goes to Godzilla.
hylian_elf wrote:Is Nightcrawler out on DVD yet?
Not at all really.Brooks wrote:People who've seen Nightcrawler: To what extent is it similar to Collateral?
JonB wrote:It's up there. I think Lucy would be mine.Aaroncupboard wrote:Worst film of the year for me goes to Godzilla.
Brooks wrote:Okay cool. Just I'd noticed some commentary saying they at least were shot rather similarly, so I had to wonder.
Absolutely. From the list in the OP all I have seen is XMenDoFP and GotG. XMen was pretty poor and GotG was fun but not particularly special.Bob wrote:I didn't really get Under the Skin. Nice to see you Reg. Traditionally shouldn't g. be here to tell us that no good films where made this year?
The ape work was indeed excellent in that, but I found it a bit lacking otherwise. The human side of things was dull and predictable. The first in this new series had more going for it.b0r1s wrote:2. Planet of The Apes - was it Rise? Despite the surprisingly small feel to the setting the actual apes show again how good motion capture, with the right actors, can work. Has Serkis won an Oscar yet?
Is that because you disapprove of the characters it's based on and feel that it rewards bad behaviour in the financial sector or because you think it's a badly made film?adored wrote:Can I give The Wolf of Wall Street negative points, I really don't want it to win?
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!