tin_robot wrote:The problem with the fine wine question I think is that we tend not to register a band’s work in the period before we thought they were brilliant. There are, I’m sure, loads of singers and bands where their latter work eclipses their earlier stuff, but we simply don’t notice.
Case in point - Tom Waits. Career started in the 70’s, yet the song that at least three of us picked is from the 00’s. (Though the other problem with this is what you do with people who are consistently great, but evolved their sound which arguably applies to Waits too. See also Scott Walker - early beautiful crooning or late experimental weirdness?)
I know people who maintain that Blur have only improved (though as “Modern Life is Rubbish” was the soundtrack to my youth I struggle to agree).
Still, for me the band that’s matured best over time is probably Swans. The took the nigh on unlistenable noise in the 80s, and have gone on to craft some really fascinating, and undeniably still difficult stuff in more recent years. Playing with genres and soundscapes, while still keeping that disquieting core.
poprock wrote:Some gems here already. Life Without Buildings are one of the best bands ever to come out of Glasgow. I was lucky to arrive in the city just as they were blowing up and got to see them play a lot.
And XC-NN had two albums, Grem. Their second one was called Lifted …
bands where their best song is more than 10 years after debut
that's a great shout, this is the kind of thing I meant.monkey wrote:The answer to this was REM. Their first single was 1981. Out of time was released in 1991 and Automatic for the People in 1992.bands where their best song is more than 10 years after debut
Coopers Green wrote:Hmm. Tricky topic.
I'll shout for Liar by Rollins Band.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!