Tempy wrote:Right, fair enough. It's all science mumbo jumbo anyway, the flavour doesn't bother me as all of it is absolute bollocks.
Tempy wrote:Right, fair enough. It's all science mumbo jumbo anyway, the flavour doesn't bother me as all of it is absolute bollocks.
mistercrayon wrote:He was being bullied by his fellow army men and did what he had to to be accepted. Maybe booker is a weak man who bends to the will of his peers? Making him not a dick but a mirror for the dickishness around him.
mistercrayon wrote:I've seen a few theories around that booker is actually Andrew Ryan, the proof being that he can run the bathysphere. I think this is nonsense because at the End of bioshock you open up the DNA thing in the bathysphere so fontatlas can use it. Put theories and stuff here!!
regmcfly wrote:I like the idea that they are the same. It explains the parallels between the opening of the two games. And as the title is indeed "infinite", and that "man, lighthouse" line, it suggests that the Jack story is another version of the DeWitt story
Tempy wrote:It's way too 'forced clever' for me. I appreciate the nods and winks, but I see no firm evidence that Jack is Ryan, especially if you count the post credits scene as the end of the infinite loop, because then Bioshock is 70 years off.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!