Moto70 wrote:What do we mean by 'slightly futuristic'? I don't remember SWAT 4 being futuristic at all? Also you could non-lethally clear every level, I know because I have done it with 2 mates. It really was a game that needed playing in co-op and to this day I still can't understand why it has never been remade...
GurtTractor wrote:I do like a game where killing isn't always required, Hitman: Blood Money is a good example.
GooberTheHat wrote:Its not about stealth for me. Its about the AI having a sense of self preservation, a fight or flight response. I would like them to have priorities. Is continuing to try and kill me, considering the current likely hood of them failing to do so and being killed by me, going to have a better outcome than them not trying to kill me and surrendering/escaping and having to face whatever consequences might arise from that course of action.
It really does sound like there would be a market for a remake...Elmlea wrote:You should try SWAT 4.
Yup! Still have my copy somewhere, too.Bollockoff wrote:Did anyone try SWAT 2? It was a top-down RTS where you could control negotiations to a limited extent and even send some grub round for the perps. A very different game to 3 & 4 but still tons of fun.
Mod74 wrote:I haven't been watching that closely, but I think it might be possible to do Metro Last Light without killing anyone.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!