Twitter twa...I mean, chatter (And various social media guff)
  • It’s amazing how different people’s experiences of Twitter can be. Because what you see/read (and who you broadcast to) is entirely self-curated, you control your own experience. You literally get out what you put in.

    Follow dickheads, get venomous bile. Follow your friends, enjoy nice chats.

    This all falls apart if you’re a celebrity though. When thousands of people know who you are, your mentions feed becomes a firehose of tepid shite.
  • If I was a celeb I don't think I'd run my own twitter. I'd get someone to hide all the bullshit from me.
    I'm falling apart to songs about hips and hearts...
  • I got a 1000+ retweet having a go at the censorious, pissed a lot of people off. Got attacked and blocked by hundreds of people. Because of that, my account ended up on the highest grade of a block list, reserved for the worst of the worst, so no I'm pre blocked by thousands more people that I've never encountered. I've even seen my name pop up on different social networks with the fact that I'm on that list as evidence that I'm a bad person. I've also had people threaten to expose me to my work in an attempt to get me fired.

    This is all with my sock puppet accounts so I'm perfectly safe and I knew what I was getting into.
    "..the pseudo-Left new style.."
  • I really don’t have the time or energy to wind people up at that level.

    Remember when Charlie Brooker stated on telly that Twitter was the most important videogame of all time? That’s how it must look to a famous person. Like a game. All about popularity stats and quashing trolls.
  • poprock wrote:
    I really don’t have the time or energy to wind people up at that level.
    It's very interesting to me that this is what you took from my experience.
    "..the pseudo-Left new style.."
  • What was the tweet..?
    Sometimes here. Sometimes Lurk. Occasionally writes a bad opinion then deletes it before posting..
  • I can't say, since I want to keep that account separate from my real name, but it was about no-platforming. Nothing that I wouldn't say again in any arena with my real name.
    "..the pseudo-Left new style.."
  • But you chose to not say it in that arena with your real name though... ?
  • I know what you mean, bad wording on my part. I choose not to make a connection between that account and my real name. There's nothing about the sentiment of my tweet that I don't stand by, but I don't want there to be any link between me and that account.
    "..the pseudo-Left new style.."
  • Oh, cos there was a bunch of other stuff that you said with that account that you don't stand by?
  • Partly that, because I started that account for an experiment so there's a lot of stuff that aren't my actual opinions, but partly because I've received threats.
    "..the pseudo-Left new style.."
  • You could write it here in mirror writing?
  • After translating the mirror writing into Spanish?
  • I'm confused here. Im not about to go search for a tweet, I was more interested in what you had to say that caused you grief.
    Sometimes here. Sometimes Lurk. Occasionally writes a bad opinion then deletes it before posting..
  • Ah. So you've been trolling then.
    Sometimes here. Sometimes Lurk. Occasionally writes a bad opinion then deletes it before posting..
  • I wouldn't call it trolling (I have referred to it as gentle trolling in the past) because the intent was not to rile people for my amusement. The intent was to have a plausible right-wing account to post mainstream right-wing views with provocative but non-offensive language (no swearing etc).
    "..the pseudo-Left new style.."
  • Did you garner any interesting results from said experiment Hamlett?
  • There is already the daily mail twitter account for that.
    Sometimes here. Sometimes Lurk. Occasionally writes a bad opinion then deletes it before posting..
  • It's not an unfair word to use, but trolling was not my intent and there was no other way I could think of to find out what I wanted to know.

    edit - @indigo I found out quite a lot. Some sites have a really low threshold for removing comments. Some sites remove sensible comments that disagree with the article while allowing nasty comments. Mainly I found out the authoritarian left is growing in number and strength. 
    I also found out a bit about myself. I got some followers that I liked and helped some people out with the right-wing account. I found it more difficult to express certain views in case people stopped liking the fake me.
    "..the pseudo-Left new style.."
  • You wanted to find out if making right wing tweets might annoy people and possibly get you on a block list? With gamergate a fresh memory I'm surprised you didn't realise it would Happen.
    Sometimes here. Sometimes Lurk. Occasionally writes a bad opinion then deletes it before posting..
  • @Ham: What was the response to your experimental control account like?
  • I suspected it would happen, but I didn't know if that kind of treatment was reserved for people that threaten/swear/use racist language, or for people that disagree on minimum-wage, immigration, crime and tax.
    djchump wrote:
    @Ham: What was the response to your experimental control account like?
    This is the thing, I didn't do a double-blind scientific study, and I regretted that pretty early on. I plan on re-running it soon but the early part of getting the accounts running was tiresome. When you've only got 6 followers people just assume (rightfully in this case) you're not genuine.
    "..the pseudo-Left new style.."
  • IanHamlett wrote:
    Mainly I found out the authoritarian left is growing in number and strength.

    DSC09258-1024x549.jpg
  • If it looks like trolling, sounds like trolling, feels like trolling, etc, etc. You can surely see why I assume you were on the wind up.
  • I can see why you might think that, but the reach of that tweet (which I agree with btw) was hundreds of times bigger than my follower count. If that had been my real twitter account then I'd pretty much have to walk away from it.
    "..the pseudo-Left new style.."
  • IanHamlett wrote:
    ...
    djchump wrote:
    @Ham: What was the response to your experimental control account like?
    This is the thing, I didn't do a double-blind scientific study, and I regretted that pretty early on. I plan on re-running it soon but the early part of getting the accounts running was tiresome. When you've only got 6 followers people just assume (rightfully in this case) you're not genuine.
    Your experiment sucks.
  • IanHamlett wrote:
    I can see why you might think that, but the reach of that tweet (which I agree with btw) was hundreds of times bigger than my follower count. If that had been my real twitter account then I'd pretty much have to walk away from it.

    You're such a tease. Why don't you post the tweet and shift all the letters forward one place in the alphabet. We can do all the working out on paper so nobody will ever link it with your real name.
  • I'll get you started - NVTMJNT
  • djchump wrote:
    IanHamlett wrote:
    ...
    djchump wrote:
    @Ham: What was the response to your experimental control account like?
    This is the thing, I didn't do a double-blind scientific study, and I regretted that pretty early on. I plan on re-running it soon but the early part of getting the accounts running was tiresome. When you've only got 6 followers people just assume (rightfully in this case) you're not genuine.
    Your experiment sucks.
    I was having a poke to see if my suspicions were right, like taking a different route to work to see which way is quicker. I'm not presenting it as scientific findings but as an anecdote of personal experience related to a news story.
    "..the pseudo-Left new style.."

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!