hunk wrote:The mystery thickens.
Scenario A or Scenario B as to who's the perpetrator?
Whatever the case it's a shitstorm and it doesn't look good for Syria.
The big question is: what happens next?
hunk wrote:Have you guys been at it the whole night?
Wait, who am I to judge?
hunk wrote:Have you guys been at it the whole night? Wait, who am I to judge?
hunk wrote:One thing's certain, there's no direct Putin-Trump line on the matter.
The US' response is too uncoordinated for that with Trump shooting from the hip.
I could be wrong of course as Putin and Trump do seem to be bromance chummy.
I don't like it. At all.
legaldinho wrote:Fucking disgrace. If they aren't bailed out by some govt fund, it'll be a scandal.
Director General of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) Ahmet Uzumcu wrote:But at that stage, the Syrian government provided some samples to our team which were collected from the impact site…some soil samples that the Syrian government authorities themselves analyzed and they found Sarin. This let us make a new evaluation because the results of these analyses, in fact, confirmed everything we found from other sources. So bearing in mind the security risks and seeing that the Syrian authorities also do confirm through those samples that Sarin was used, we decided not to put at risk our team and go to Khan Sheikhun,” Uzumcu further said.
legaldinho wrote:I just don't understand why you seem to think that "finding sarin" debunks hersch's article, despite my repeated comments, which noted that the OPCW found sarin and a bunch of other things. Did you understand that to mean "OPCW found no sarin and if it did it's game over"? We are going around in circles.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!