ShabbyMcCrabby wrote:I watched Dunkirk.
If you have a proper IMAX nearby I strongly suggest seeing it there. So much of it filmed in the 1570 format it makes you wonder why there's any bits that weren't. Bizarre.
As a movie, I'm not sure really. It starts quite strong but straight away the lack of blood I found to be quite jarring. It seems to be trying to be a realistic portrayal of what happened but then non-violent violence betrays that.
Spoiler:
Ultimately it's okay. It just lost me by the end. Not sure if it was our screening and the film reels but there was some disjointed colour correction between cuts at points too.
I look for to checking out the Making Of stuff though as I imagine there's a lot of real stuff in there.
Still, doesn't really come close to challenging his other movies with The Prestige being the only one I want to watch again every now and then with Interstellar being second with some quality powerful moments. Then I guess Batman or whatever.
Shit, meant Interstellar.legaldinho wrote:It's a great, imaginative and spectacular flick. Interstellar too, but has real emotion roped in. Love is the answer. It's real reg.
Liveinadive wrote:Is there more to it than "WE'VE GOT TO BOATS UP THE SOLJESS!" "FUCK MY LEGS BLEW UP!" ?
Tempy wrote:I saw a review that said the film "lacked a real villain" and that "home was so close, that it removed any sense of peril. It was a short enough distance that the soldiers should have just swam back."
Tempy wrote:I saw a review that said the film "lacked a real villain" and that "home was so close, that it removed any sense of peril. It was a short enough distance that the soldiers should have just swam back."
Yossarian wrote:Are you mixing up your definite/indefinite articles after too many cocktails, hair?
djchump wrote:
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!