There's no rush. End of January should do it.Nina wrote:Till when can we vote? I might be able to see 5 2014 films after all!
Bob wrote:Surely Keaton has that sewn up Reg?
I saw the Stephen Hawking film the other day - that's a seriously good performance. Plus bonus award points for playing a real person and disabled.regmcfly wrote:Hmmm... It's either washed up comeback or real world + prosthetics. The academy loves both.Bob wrote:Surely Keaton has that sewn up Reg?
Dark Soldier wrote:All that love for Budapest. God damn.
JonB wrote:I saw the Stephen Hawking film the other day - that's a seriously good performance. Plus bonus award points for playing a real person and disabled.regmcfly wrote:Hmmm... It's either washed up comeback or real world + prosthetics. The academy loves both.Bob wrote:Surely Keaton has that sewn up Reg?
Are we really saying that the ScoobyDoo2 director isn't the one that made GotG a bit too ScoobyDoo?regmcfly wrote:Me and Temps have had major discussions about GotG. Problem isn't the director - one look at his other specialities confirms that - but the restrictions of the Marvel Universe. They got a "cool name" director to do it, which is becoming a Marvel standard (cf. Cap Am 2, Avengers, Iron Man 1,3) but then they're still very much restrained the the marvel mince machine - it makes mince, whether it is in space or on earth. Don't get me wrong, I thought GotG was pretty good, and certainly the best Marvel movie in a long time, but Gunn has dropped hints on the film he WANTED to make, which would have been very R and NSFTK, which suggests more to do with the hand of Arad and the all-ighty-ollar than Gunn.
WorKid wrote:There's not that much a director can do - especially when there's a licence and it's a Marvel film anyway. He didn't write the fucking thing.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!