mistercrayon wrote:GooberTheHat wrote:I said I didn't have the energy yesterday, I've slept now. I thought punching was the strategy we were endorsing? Why are we having all the discussion when we know that just punching people works. Also, I didn't preach tolerance. There is no need to be tolerant of a belief in order to debate it, or engage with those that hold that belief.mistercrayon wrote:You chat about tolerance and say you quit from the discussion then merely chirp in with perpetual goading quips about punching.GooberTheHat wrote:Just punch them, it'll be OK
understanding, discussion or whatever.
Yossarian wrote:cockbeard wrote:Yossarian wrote:cockbeard wrote:Ffs
Oddly enough, hate speech and incitement to violence aren't necessarily crimes in the states
See I did think that you are simply being contrary, now I know that's true because you aren't as stupid as your posts in here would have people believe. Being as you're playing the fool and simply choosing to be contrary I'm out as you have no actual opinion to add
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/yes-the-first-amendment-does-protect-so-called-hate-speech/
Brooks wrote:Media Studies as survival tool makes a lorra sense to me in 2017.
Brooks wrote:I'm from the media studies course of Life me.
Liveinadive wrote:Your backing of physical violence without trial in this thread and your on going supportive views of violence against cats paints you as a stereotypical psychopath Yoss. You seem especially interested in hiding data as well. Could just as well report your views to the police. Duck, duck, fucked.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!