TRUMP on Oct 3rd: "I spoke to (McConnell)...he said, 'That was the most innocent phone call that I've read.'"
MCCONNELL today: "I don't recall any conversations with the President about that phone call."
GooberTheHat wrote:I do think there is some serious resentment toward him from the military/establishment over his treatment of the Kurds. That coupled with the other stuff you've said provides those Republicans who've always despised him, but sided with him for strategic reasons, a potential out. If public opinion swings against him they can get rid of him and still hope to retain their seats.
I still don't think he will go, but I don't think it will do his reelection hopes any good.
Yossarian wrote:
hunk wrote:Haha, AOC spanked Zuckerberg in public. She demonstrated why fb is incapable of factchecking and ad targeting at the same time. Zuckerberg really doesn't know how to answer her questions. Not truthfully anyways.
JMW wrote:There’s some seriously bad decision-making going on at the top of Facebook in terms of public image v. how much money do we actually need anymore from dodgy advertising.
dynamiteReady wrote:
Politicians have been lying for too long to make this out to be a new issue.
When you think about what people appear to be asking for here, it's technically the same thing that made Facebook the bogeyman in the first place...
Blanket fucking surveillance.
The easiest fix, would be a federal classification board for political media.
It's not fair to ask Facebook to do the governments work.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!