Liveinadive wrote:Is it not a tech requirement issue? My understanding is that 4k requires a higher pixel count whereas 3D requires a high refresh rate. If that is the case then I imagine combining the two would prove very expensive.
LtPidgeon wrote:Childintime wrote:Might be worth checking a Chinese brand - 3D is still mega here so I'd expect Chinese hdtvs to still have it...
Being a fussy bugger, I only buy Sony TVs. I think I'd rather do without than buy one of those HiSense or whatever they are called.
Andy wrote:The sooner 3D dies forever, the better.
Kernowgaz wrote:
Andy wrote:No need for the snideness, gaz. If it was easy to ignore, fine. When you're going to the cinema, 3D screenings are taking up spots for 2D films. You have to navigate past the 3D. Then there's the fact that it was driving up the cost of TVs, and the clutter of the glasses. It's all unnecessary.
Is star wars includedafgavinstan wrote:So anyway, 2 for £18 on SELECTED Disney titles on 3D BR at yer local HMV and here.
Nolegaldinho wrote:Is star wars includedafgavinstan wrote:So anyway, 2 for £18 on SELECTED Disney titles on 3D BR at yer local HMV and here.
afgavinstan wrote:Only reason for it I can come to is that the 3D release of TFA arrived in November last year, 7 months after the standard home release, complimented with big holographic packaging and extra content and other guff. It's 'newer' and Disney love money, and it's still £19, so pay up, nerds.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!