HawBawJaws wrote:As my bawbag ex is currently finding out, as she rattled her car into another one last week. Not even had her car 7 days and she prangs fuck out of it. Am i allowed to laugh, given that nobody was hurt??
afgavinstan wrote:Hmmm, I'll look more at the Mazda then. Happy with a Badger Approved vehicle. Although why do affordable Asian shapes have to be so.... So..... So..... Meh lookin?
Also, I'm confused at the messaging here. Get diesel, save on car tax, but also don't get diesel, cos it bad. Huh?
HawBawJaws wrote:If it was between a ceed, i30 and a mazda3, it'd be a choice between the mazda and the kia for me. The i30's only nice in the bonkers n trim or whatever it's called, imo. Am i right in saying that the mazda still shares underpinnings with the ford focus, and my old Volvo?
GooberTheHat wrote:Nah mate.
Verecocha wrote:My TTS is £270 a year to tax. But you should still get one.
Bob wrote:Dude. PM me. My bosses son did them he charges £50+VaT a wheel. He's just opened up and he's very good.
Taylor Clarke are VW/Audi trained and probably the best value I think. You could try Us but i wouldn't. lol.
cockbeard wrote:HawBawJaws wrote:If it was between a ceed, i30 and a mazda3, it'd be a choice between the mazda and the kia for me. The i30's only nice in the bonkers n trim or whatever it's called, imo. Am i right in saying that the mazda still shares underpinnings with the ford focus, and my old Volvo?
Most of it yes, they seem to do the pretty thing better than the others. If we were drawing comparisons I'd say
Ford = VW
Volvo = Audi
Mazda = Seat
Bob wrote:
Dinostar77 wrote:Audi and Volvo do have nice interiors, though the AMG A35 has raised the bar on interiors for hatchbacks. Seat is definitely a slightly poorer relation to a VW.cockbeard wrote:Ford = VW Volvo = Audi Mazda = Seat
GooberTheHat wrote:Bob wrote:
My car. I prefer the lines on the mazda, it's less boxy. The front end is similar though.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!