superflyninja wrote:@Yossarian
But what evidence to the contrary? Can you pop some links? Im not having a go, in the course of me looking into this what I can see is we lack enough facts on the object to form a clear understanding. If there is something Ive missed please link it.
Dinostar77 wrote:Been staying out of this conversation but im intrigued by what dynamite said. Thst Oumuamua has travelled from a few galaxies away? That cant be right. Firstly how could you provide that? Has an authoritative source actual confirmed that or is that just a hypothesis. Cause i am genuinely intrigued. That would make it the first object i ever heard of coming from another galaxy. Dynamite, did you mean another solar system in the milky way? Sounds more plausible.To be fair to Loeb, and I'm definitely oversimplifying this here, his basic challenge to the commonly accepted theory, to a layman, doesn't sound too far fetched. If you pare it right down, consensus suspects: - That Oumuamua is a hydrogren icecube which came from a few galaxies away. When it got to the solar system, the sun melted it's surface, and the melted hydrogen somehow combusted, providing enough acceleration to fly out of the solar system, in an event that has never been witnessed before.
In general of course I would agree with this. The problem here is a lack of conclusive evidence in either direction. I think this case is less about Oumouamoua and more about Loeb getting the Rouj treatment for even mentioning aliens.Yossarian wrote:I’m not following this particular case all that closely, I’m talking in more general terms. Scientists who speculated that the Wow signal could have come from an extraterrestrial origin weren’t branded kooks. Scientists who suggested that Europa might show evidence of life weren’t called kooks. Honestly, the argument that he’s being branded a kook simply for speculating that this could be alien sounds more like the position of an anti-vaxxer or climate change denier than that of a serious scientist.superflyninja wrote:@Yossarian But what evidence to the contrary? Can you pop some links? Im not having a go, in the course of me looking into this what I can see is we lack enough facts on the object to form a clear understanding. If there is something Ive missed please link it.
monkey wrote:What if Oumuamua is the tic tac mother ship?
What then eh?
Roujin wrote:Yo post this in the weird thread. Dying to see the reaction to that bad boy in there.
Yeah that’s it. Where the official explanation is as unlikely (or more unlikely) than a speculative explanation.GooberTheHat wrote:Justifiably Sceptical
Roujin wrote:Yeah but I think the distinction is drawn because there are pictures and videos and stuff of "UFOs" be they ultimately of human or extra terrestrial origin, as well as reports and other stuff from places which may or may not be real, hence we can speculate about it, but there is no similar kind of evidence for the abduction theory, only the testimony of the abductees themselves.
Roujin wrote:Yeah but I think the distinction is drawn because there are pictures and videos and stuff of "UFOs" be they ultimately of human or extra terrestrial origin, as well as reports and other stuff from places which may or may not be real, hence we can speculate about it, but there is no similar kind of evidence for the abduction theory, only the testimony of the abductees themselves.
nick_md wrote:I just mean, if I were an alien with the ability to visit and monitor earth, I'd probably abduct some of the locals for research. We do it all the time with animals, probably.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!