RamSteelwood wrote:it's probably also worth a warning that if you actually enjoy the prequels you should get your head examined.
According to this, Sith sabres somethingorotherabout synthetic light saver crystals, more powerful but unstable or something: http://screenrant.com/star-wars-7-lightsaber-crossguard-explained/b0r1s wrote:Sith saber designed to cause more pain?stellavista wrote:One thing concerning this new lightsaber, the beam seems almost fire-like and jagged, and not smooth like pretty much every other lightsaber we've seen in the other movies. Not sure what this means, is it weaker, badly made, or stronger etc. but the beam is definitely different.
djchump wrote:I still haven't tried Machete order either. NB - for any fans of truly shitty films, a mate tells me that the Red Letter Media "Best of the Worst" podcasty video episode thingies are pretty amusing; film nerds picking the worst bargain basement trash they can find and ripping the piss.
djchump wrote:According to this, Sith sabres somethingorotherabout synthetic light saver crystals, more powerful but unstable or something: http://screenrant.com/star-wars-7-lightsaber-crossguard-explained/b0r1s wrote:Sith saber designed to cause more pain?stellavista wrote:One thing concerning this new lightsaber, the beam seems almost fire-like and jagged, and not smooth like pretty much every other lightsaber we've seen in the other movies. Not sure what this means, is it weaker, badly made, or stronger etc. but the beam is definitely different.
Tempy wrote:Trailer reminds me I preferred being 12 and not privy to discourse about the deconstruction of the logic behind plasma based energy swords
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!