I'm starting to think this, though saying that I'm also starting to think about just not bothering with all the mis-information and next to know definitive, clear cut statements of fact.Plan M wrote:I wish it was out earlier I want next gen gaming goodness NOW! (After I've finished Walking Dead that is). I've already traded in all 360 games apart from PES.
Moto70 wrote:
Moto70 wrote:I'm starting to think this, though saying that I'm also starting to think about just not bothering with all the mis-information and next to know definitive, clear cut statements of fact.Plan M wrote:I wish it was out earlier I want next gen gaming goodness NOW! (After I've finished Walking Dead that is). I've already traded in all 360 games apart from PES.
Which ever way you try and butter that up I'd like to see you try and get that through Advertising Standards, simple answer is you wouldn't. It would be declared as misleading.Yossarian wrote:It's not contradictory information. It states quite clearly that streaming is required for playing PS3 games, that does not mean that an internet connection is required to use the console.Moto70 wrote:
You know I don't so why are you acting like a prick? I have however had to deal with advertising issues (remember I worked in motorsport mainly on the sponsorship side of things) and I am capable of reading stories about the ASA.Yossarian wrote:Well, I wasn't aware that you worked for the ASA, I'll have to bow before your superior knowledge.
I merely said that I would like to try and see that ran as an advert and it would be shown for being misleading, obviously Yoss then jumped in and ran with it.Bob wrote:It's not an advert though so it seems a moot point.
But not at the same time.Bob wrote:Indeed. I do see what your saying.. but presumably like I say a lot of features on consumer products these days require an internet connection to work. Both facts are correct. Yes you need an internet connection to stream.. but in the context of the comparison you don't need an internet connection to own the system and play games on it.. I can't be the only one forseeing a Watchdog X-Box One feature when it looks countless numpties out of playing games cos of no internet.
Bob wrote:It's not an advert though so it seems a moo point.
Moto70 wrote:I can't be the only person to wonder what would possess anybody to highlight 2 features of a system as a USP when they contradict each other?
Moto70 wrote:But not at the same time. @Yoss: We have all been debating the various issues and favouring one side over another, some more than others, but in all of my posts to you when have I ever acted in an antagonising manner? Your post was just fucking rude.Bob wrote:Indeed. I do see what your saying.. but presumably like I say a lot of features on consumer products these days require an internet connection to work. Both facts are correct. Yes you need an internet connection to stream.. but in the context of the comparison you don't need an internet connection to own the system and play games on it.. I can't be the only one forseeing a Watchdog X-Box One feature when it looks countless numpties out of playing games cos of no internet.
Bob wrote:I can't be the only one forseeing a Watchdog X-Box One feature when it looks countless numpties out of playing games cos of no internet.
Mod74 wrote:All of the major gaming shock horror stories I've seen over the last few years have been when customers have wanted to access online services but couldn't (Diablo, SimCity, XBL Xmas crash, PSN hack). I'm really not sure how big this gamers who don't have the internet -in the developed world- market really is.Bob wrote:I can't be the only one forseeing a Watchdog X-Box One feature when it looks countless numpties out of playing games cos of no internet.
yeah, can't believe i haven't seen it anywhere else, and disappointed in myself for not thinking of it. that must prove i'm not a fanboy or something...JMW wrote:Playstation 4, XBox One - I like that.
Mod74 wrote:Bob wrote:I can't be the only one forseeing a Watchdog X-Box One feature when it looks countless numpties out of playing games cos of no internet.
All of the major gaming shock horror stories I've seen over the last few years have been when customers have wanted to access online services but couldn't (Diablo, SimCity, XBL Xmas crash, PSN hack). I'm really not sure how big this gamers who don't have the internet -in the developed world- market really is.
Plan M wrote:I've already traded in all 360 games apart from PES.
So with the PS4 hardware specs mostly done and dusted, the only real questions remaining concern the CPU and RAM resources swallowed up by the operating system. Guerrilla Games' recent post mortem of its Killzone: Shadow Fall PS4 reveal demo suggests that two CPU cores are reserved for the OS (something we're told could change but remains the current working allocation), but the amount of GDDR5 required by background processes remains unknown. What we do know is that 512MB was the target during the time that PS4 was slated to ship with just 4GB of system RAM, with current murmurings suggesting that has doubled to 1GB. At the same time, the Guerrilla post mortem contains a memory map with around 3GB of "spare" memory which could be occupied by the OS. One theory - yet to be confirmed - suggests that the game DVR - which records footage as you play - may be writing to a RAM disk, saving on hard drive bandwidth. 15 minutes of 1080p h.264 video could swallow up anything up to 1GB of RAM, but some might say that it would be something of a waste to utilise high performance memory on an application like this that would require at most around 2MB/s of bandwidth (PS4 GDDR5 tops out at 176GB/s)
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!