Liveinadive wrote:I really enjoyed 3. I'm no expert on the series, not into the deep PvP stuff so can't really comment on that but It was fun.
Souls 1 is only really solid up to S&O, then it is very hit and miss.
2 is total turd of a game.
digi wrote:This!Liveinadive wrote:I really enjoyed 3. I'm no expert on the series, not into the deep PvP stuff so can't really comment on that but It was fun. Souls 1 is only really solid up to S&O, then it is very hit and miss. 2 is total turd of a game.
stonechalice wrote:You never really loved the first one.. .
stonechalice wrote:Forgot to say on here but the finale episodes of Bonfireside chat are proper spine tingly. Those guys did such an awesome job with that show. Quite sad it's no longer a thing.
Great listening. Highly recommended.
TheDJR wrote:stonechalice wrote:You never really loved the first one.. .
What about me?
Curtis wrote:@ DS - Where do i begin? a) You're a cretin with no taste whatsoever. b) You think your opinion matters when in actual fact...see above. c) Even if the above wasn't true, giving up prematurely is poor form, regardless. d) Sitting on your arse and watching a playthrough is the exact same experience.
stonechalice wrote:Yep! I'd just got my cat then. Remember Brightstone Cove?
TheDJR wrote:I think Scholar is worse than the original.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!