Ha ha ha

Kow wrote:

It does annoy me when I am called to another part of the house for something which turns out to be answering a question that she could have come and asked me wherever I was.

This drives me nuts. When I shout her and she can't hear what I'm saying I'm supposed to come to her.. when it's the other way round I'm supposed to come to her.

Hhhmmm. 
I got nothing from it at all. 
If you are a regular here or follow kotaku etc... then there's very little new or any revelations at all. 
Some nice concept art that you could most likely find online and some interesting controversial aspects of games I.e. misogyny, race etc... But I think those topics have been covered here and on kotaku thoroughly. 
Price is steep as well at £18 per person.

Aye I'm keen to go, just tricky to be organized enough to go

I found it all very... brief. 
And I disagree £18 each for at most 30 mins walking through dark rooms is expensive. 
Frieda Kahlo (also at the V&A) is not my thing but the missus wanted to go and that had about 6 times more content and time and effort (seemingly) put into it. 
It's the second exhibition I've been to there recently that was more in my wheelhouse and I was deeply disappointed about how lightweight they both were. 

And of course you can find anything online but my argument is, as people who are into this game shit we've/you've most definitely come across everything that the exhibition has to teachm or show you already. 
A non-gamer is more likely to get something from it. Especially if they've gone with a gamer in tow.

Bingo. Your missus and kid will get something from it. You will get a bit from fleshing out the info. 
4 badgers together.... Will get little out of it, in my opinion.

Aye in fairness I had no inclination to go by myself, it was the missus that mentioned it and that her son would like it; that tipped the balance for me.

pantyfire wrote:

I found it all very... brief.  And I disagree £18 each for at most 30 mins walking through dark rooms is expensive.  Frieda Kahlo (also at the V&A) is not my thing but the missus wanted to go and that had about 6 times more content and time and effort (seemingly) put into it.  It's the second exhibition I've been to there recently that was more in my wheelhouse and I was deeply disappointed about how lightweight they both were.  And of course you can find anything online but my argument is, as people who are into this game shit we've/you've most definitely come across everything that the exhibition has to teachm or show you already.  A non-gamer is more likely to get something from it. Especially if they've gone with a gamer in tow.

Well, YMMV and all that. We were in there for about two and a half hours. I hadn’t seen much, if any, of that content anywhere else. That may be because I don’t go looking for it but I’m sure I’m not the only one. Just because it’s a hobby I enjoy doesn’t mean I research every aspect of every game. There were even a couple of smaller games I’d never heard of. And I’d be fairly confident there’s stuff in there you couldn’t find elsewhere.

Tbh, if that happened several times my reaction would be to ignore anything they said out of earshot.

Well, 12:42's news...

Clarkson?

Oh, twats not cunts. There's a difference I think. Trump is a twat, as is Mogg. Clarkson would be a cunt.

I think Gove is more of a cunt than a twat.

DS confirmed twat.