WorKid wrote:
WorKid wrote:Here goes Jez. Will he even say the 'R' word or stick with 'all options are on my wonderful table'?
This is the message the country needs and the only hope of uniting both factions.I would put it like this: if you’re living in Tottenham you may well have voted to Remain.
You’ve got high bills rising debts. You’re in insecure work. You struggle to make your wages stretch and you may be on universal credit, and forced to access food banks.
You’re up against it.
If you’re living in Mansfield, you are more likely to have voted to Leave.
You’ve got high bills, rising debts, you’re in insecure work, you struggle to make your wages stretch and you may be on universal credit and forced to access food banks.
You’re up against it.
But you’re not against each other.
LivDiv wrote:May's deal has to be rejected first before anything else can happen.
Blimey. PM will lose meaningful vote on Tuesday by a majority of 228, research by @BBCPolitics finds. Number of MPs opposing up by 19 since the delay last month. For: 206, Against: 433.
Currently, she is still on for the biggest Commons defeat on record - beating the minority Labour government's losing tally of 166 in 1924. The largest post-war defeat was by 89, to the Callaghan minority Govt in 1979 (ht the excellent @philipjcowley).
Yossarian wrote:These guys disagree with that.
http://www.transportforqualityoflife.com/u/files/120630_Rebuilding_Rail_Final_Report_print_version.pdf
A structure of this kind, if applied to Britain, seems likely to result in the least friction
with EU rules, with flexibility about how to meet them in detail. However, this model
should not be regarded as the only possible choice. Judging from past form, other
EU countries would appear likely to find innovative modifications to their present rail
structures so that they can survive the Commission’s push to fragment them for
many more years.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!