equinox_code wrote:I think you might be getting a bit worked up, BS
Which one?TheDJR wrote:Don't mention the m word.
equinox_code wrote:I think you might be getting a bit worked up, BS
Stopharage wrote:"Not my type" is fair enough but "she's a munter" seems a touch disingenuous. That's not directed at anyone in particular, just saying.
afgavinstan wrote:Quick!
Oh jennifer.
afgavinstan wrote:Quick!
Oh jennifer.
Hodge360 wrote:
Chief wrote:Jennifer Lawrence is probably the most "real" woman in Hollywood right now. It's refreshing.
Firstly I dont understand a thing about soccerball. I wasnt aware that this thread was for supreme beings of sexiness. For example the last GIF I posted, her of the shapeless tit. Really pretty face and very decent body resulting in arousal for my good self! Job done! Not saying she is untouchably hot, but that i would throw her a bone if such an opportunity were to present itself. fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fapadkm1979 wrote:It's not that different to highlight the imperfections of gorgeous ladies in a sins of the flesh thread, particularly when they are being held aloft as examples of perfection.
pantyfire wrote:Oddly it's the shoulder wobble more than the bewbs and bum bit that gets me going.
Oh, good grief. Okay, not perfection. Will, 'I n the higher echelons' do?Blue Swirl wrote:Since when have they been put forward as examples of perfection?
Oh for fuck's sake. Are you even listening to yourself? Or, more to the point, listening to the way most people talk about football?Blue Swirl wrote:Same as your football example; "wow, he really messed up that pass in this world cup semi-final match, why would a pro player make such an elementary mistake?" versus "what an overpaid ugly twat mucher. What the fuck was the manager thinking, putting that retard on the field?".
Feel all you want, you're dreaming.Blue Swirl wrote:I feel as though you said something inadvisable in the spur of the moment, got called out on it, and rather than admit you were in the wrong, you're now back pedaling and trying to find some justification, no matter how slim.
But there's nothing remotely mysoginistic about posting images where women have been digitally doctored to no longer look like they really do, sometimes not even be the shape of an actual human, or captured in a gif so we can endlessly watch their tits jiggling? Take a look at yourself.Blue Swirl wrote:They're just pointing out that it's a bit harsh (and maybe even a smidgen misogynistic) to point out every tiny flaw in what are otherwise stonkingly gorgeous people.
That's not what I said, so you're setting up a nice wee straw man to knock down there.Blue Swirl wrote:Plus, you may be correct in that the previous version of this thread was a friendlier place. Now, who's fault is this?
Blue Swirl wrote:I'll just leave this here.
Brooks wrote:disrupt my trousering.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!