Brooks wrote:I don't care. US healthcare provision is also appalling and amounts to its own catalogue of less sensational atrocious outcomes, for instance.
It's their business I'm afraid. This has been true for the Middle East for several decades, remains so for the Far East. It will be shit, the only choice is whether you want it all over yourself too.
Oh noes muh precious international rules based system, which no major player has basically shat on in living memory already at all.What we're looking at there is the destruction of the international rules based system. It would be a free-for-all after that, with every tin pot nation around the world choosing to settle its border disputes with force.
Why the fuck not?Let's not use the folly of the West's history of mis-intervention and failed nation building in the Middle East as evidence that it shouldn't get involved in maintaining peace in the Far East.
Taiwan is currently only important to the west because of some silicon foundries located there.
Kow wrote:By success in the Balkans you mean that time we bombed the shit out of a country in order to tell them that bombing the shit out of a country was not acceptable?
Kow wrote:By success in the Balkans you mean that time we bombed the shit out of a country in order to tell them that bombing the shit out of a country was not acceptable?
Kow wrote:NATO forces are still in Kosovo. We didn't leave.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!