Ian wrote:Hi Plan M.
Ian wrote:Yep. I didn't originally apply to work there.
Moot_Geeza wrote:I disliked their coverage of 16-bit games, and found many of their early reviews amateurish, and certainly not what I was looking for at the time, especially as a Sega fan. I've not been keen on many of their early reviews, on most platforms, whenever I've read them online. I started to buy it towards the end of the Saturn's life, and only stopped subscribing a couple of months ago. For a good decade after '98ish I trusted (and far more often than not, agreed with) their reviews more than any publication, in print or online. A dip in quality coupled with the new website debacle and gradually becoming less interested in modern retail games made me cancel my sub. Their features haven't interested me for ages, Redeye and Biffo were never satisfactorily replaced for the columns, I never read any of their developer sections towards the back, or the 'focus on...tits in gaming' style of articles. I doubt I spent longer than ten minutes reading/skimming a new copy in the past year. It's a shame, but it was at the top for an extremely long time, and none of the current alternatives hold a candle to the mag in its prime, or in its current state for that matter, it just ran out of steam. It's the magazine equivalent of Paul Scholes.
Escape wrote:Porno trawlermen from the '90s. Readers' Wives was the deadliest catch.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!