Paul the sparky wrote:Skondo wrote:Gordon looked for everything this afternoon. Cheered went he was sent off, grade A c*nt.
West Ham should never have let a 3-1 lead slip, but I wasn’t surprised.
Gordon now leads my ‘top c*nt’ list, with van Dijk relegated to second and Conor Gallagher third.
Looked for everything? He's a pest but was clearly fouled for both pens. Not sure what he's supposed to do, not go near the ball in case they kick him?
I'd have a squint at your own clumsy clowns giving away pens and your shit scared gollum twat in the dugout nullifying your threat before I start looking at the opposition players
Paul the sparky wrote:Looked for everything? He's a pest but was clearly fouled for both pens. Not sure what he's supposed to do, not go near the ball in case they kick him? I'd have a squint at your own clumsy clowns giving away pens and your shit scared gollum twat in the dugout nullifying your threat before I start looking at the opposition playersSkondo wrote:Gordon looked for everything this afternoon. Cheered went he was sent off, grade A c*nt. West Ham should never have let a 3-1 lead slip, but I wasn’t surprised. Gordon now leads my ‘top c*nt’ list, with van Dijk relegated to second and Conor Gallagher third.
Paul the sparky wrote:Exactly what it is. Quick thinking, good awareness and reactions. Exactly the opposite of what Phillips is showing
Paul the sparky wrote:It's not obstruction if the ball is in playing distance.
Cupatay wrote:Because if he's taken control of the ball and then got cleaned out it could be a foul.
As it stands I see it as a 50/50 clash at best. West Ham players going for the ball and Gordons sole intention is to initiate contact with the player in the hope of buying a peno. I don't see how it's any more a foul on Gordon as it is on the other guy. That's why Gordon touching the ball makes a difference in my eyes.
I just dont think it should be rewarded. It goes in the same category as a dive or feigning injury or any of the other nonsense that goes on.
Paul the sparky wrote:It's not obstruction if the ball is in playing distance.
If the balls in playing distance then why didn't Gordon play the ball. That's not even a question because we know what the answer is.
Personally I think it's bollocks and I dont wanna see them given but maybe that's just me.
Cupatay wrote:Because if he's taken control of the ball and then got cleaned out it could be a foul.
As it stands I see it as a 50/50 clash at best. West Ham players going for the ball and Gordons sole intention is to initiate contact with the player in the hope of buying a peno. I don't see how it's any more a foul on Gordon as it is on the other guy. That's why Gordon touching the ball makes a difference in my eyes.
I just dont think it should be rewarded. It goes in the same category as a dive or feigning injury or any of the other nonsense that goes on.
Paul the sparky wrote:It's not obstruction if the ball is in playing distance.
If the balls in playing distance then why didn't Gordon play the ball. That's not even a question because we know what the answer is.
Personally I think it's bollocks and I dont wanna see them given but maybe that's just me.
Paul the sparky wrote:Cupatay wrote:Because if he's taken control of the ball and then got cleaned out it could be a foul.
As it stands I see it as a 50/50 clash at best. West Ham players going for the ball and Gordons sole intention is to initiate contact with the player in the hope of buying a peno. I don't see how it's any more a foul on Gordon as it is on the other guy. That's why Gordon touching the ball makes a difference in my eyes.
I just dont think it should be rewarded. It goes in the same category as a dive or feigning injury or any of the other nonsense that goes on.
Paul the sparky wrote:It's not obstruction if the ball is in playing distance.
If the balls in playing distance then why didn't Gordon play the ball. That's not even a question because we know what the answer is.
Personally I think it's bollocks and I dont wanna see them given but maybe that's just me.
One player kicks another and it's 50/50? Explain.
Gordon doesn't have to play the ball, that's not what the rule says. As long as it's within playing distance he can get his body within it and the opposition and it's not obstruction.
Some clutching at straws going on
Paul the sparky wrote:I've not heard a single decent reason why it's not a penalty.
"It's like diving"
No it isn't. At all
LarryDavid wrote:Goddamn this is tedious.
LarryDavid wrote:I’ll happily take another dreary goalless 45 minutes.
Thought it would be more of a game though.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!