Speedhaak wrote:Well personally I don't know what the fascination is with playing games based in the real world. It defeats the escapism aspect of it all.
Speedhaak wrote:Well personally I don't know what the fascination is with playing games based in the real world. It defeats the escapism aspect of it all.
FranticPea wrote:As in the BF map dlc?
Speedhaak wrote:Although, if it weren't Ubisoft and had they not (once again) put misleading content out there prior to this I might have been interested, but after watching several YouTube and seeing just how downgraded the graphics are compared to E3 I thinks it's foolish to give them money. Really unsavoury practise, it is.
regmcfly wrote:There'd been rumours for ages that it was a "secret numbers game", but none of the vids / footage till now had been so explicit. What a gutter if this is it for this gen.
Facewon wrote:I'm sure I always had the impression it was rpgish.
Matt_82 wrote:
g.man wrote:Angry Joe sits down with the devs and plays The Division for an hour. Asks a lot of questions, gets a lot of answers. There's nearly an hour of this, but if you're at all interested in the game, then it's well worth watching... Me? I'm liking the look of most of what I'm seeing. Looks like it could be a hoot in co-op/multiplayer.
stonechalice wrote:After what Ubisoft did with Watchdogs you can colour me completely out of the frame for this. It looks heavily run of the mill. Visuals look way worse than that initial E3 reveal. I do wonder how much variety there will be with nothing but humanoid AI to shoot as well. The third person action looks distinctly lacklustre.
Fair warning, I'm going to waffle here...pantyfire wrote:It took them too long to get it running. Nowadays if it's not working well out of the box then by the time it's fixed its dead. Caveat - online.
pantyfire wrote:
I want a tight tactical team shooter, that isn't a jacked up on speed twitch fest.
FranticPea wrote:This. I don't think this is it though, but am willing to give it a shot.pantyfire wrote:I want a tight tactical team shooter, that isn't a jacked up on speed twitch fest.
beano wrote:FranticPea wrote:This. I don't think this is it though, but am willing to give it a shot.pantyfire wrote:I want a tight tactical team shooter, that isn't a jacked up on speed twitch fest.
This is what I am expecting from this- watched a few vids the other night- not really on board with the crit. in here but have noticed the difference between visual promises in the recent vid. DIdn't Watchdags face the same aesthetic challenge when it came to delivery?
stonechalice wrote:It's not misleading, it's fact.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!