So, what, a wacky comedy about a guy trying to recover from his addiction to exposing himself to 8-year-olds?poprock wrote:This came up in a Google search for something completely different, but … there actually is going to be a Big Lebowski sequel. Sort of. A spin-off, anyway. Going Places. John Turturro has been pushing for years to make a spin-off movie starring himself as The Jesus. And it’s actually happened. He’s the writer, director and star, and it also features Audrey Tatou and Susan Sarandon. It’s a remake of Going Places, a ’70s French comedy … but it’s been altered to make it a Big Lebowski spin-off. It’s genuinely due for release this year, after hanging around the festival circuit for ages looking for distribution.
JonB wrote:So, what, a wacky comedy about a guy trying to recover from his addiction to exposing himself to 8-year-olds?
Jaco wrote:Tonight we watched Contagion. Haven’t seen it since initial release. Forgotten what a cracking film it is. Damon on excellent ‘every man’ form. Not sure anyone but Hanksdoes it better. Highly recommend if you’ve not seen it.
Gremill wrote:I've not seen it - the concept is too terrifying!
Today I watched Aquaman. After being very pleasantly surprised by Justice League and enjoying 2/3 of Wonder Woman I had, if not high hopes, then the thought that I'd be getting at least a good Sunday afternoon action romp.
What I actually got was an absolute tyre fire of a film that went from amusing to bad to high camp to awful to so bad its good then back to astonishingly terrible. There's almost nothing good about it, save some quite inventive action set piece concepts which the director fails to make worth while. It reminded me a lot of the worst of the early comic book and video game adaptations, except on an astronomical budget - right down to the terrible costumes.
How can a film look both big budget with astonishing VFX AND cheap as chips 80s straight to video (often in the same scene)? How can big name actors, with dozens of years of experience under their belts, read lines like they've never even seen the English language before? Who wrote these lines? Was it an actual fish? If so it was in the wrong plaice at the wrong time - nearly every joke fails to land and, OH GOD THE EXPOSITION.
How do 2 superheroes with entirely water based powers get from the middle of the Sahara to Scicily in 1 day? Why is this film 5 days long?
Awful awful awful shite.
SpaceGazelle wrote:Tbf I'd watch that.JonB wrote:So, what, a wacky comedy about a guy trying to recover from his addiction to exposing himself to 8-year-olds?
davyK wrote:Watched Open Range last night. Good old yarn and a superb cast. I'm quite the Costner fanboy and this did that status no harm at all.
ShabbyMcCrabby wrote:Aquaman is a mess for sure. YMMV depending on how much you want to switch your brain off.
Grem says a lot of true things. Some effects are great some are woeful. Some costumes are great, most look like they're throw aways from the Power Rangers TV show. There's way too much expositional dialogue that's actually for the audience. There's that Africa cover song. There's a bad guy that comes and goes from the film.
But, switch your brain to 0 and you might have some fun. I mean there's Julie Andrews as a giant sea monster and also a talking crab thing and people riding sharks and terrible de-aging effects and a horror sequence and a terrible romance sequence and an average Indiana Jones sequence and.........
Paul the sparky wrote:Really? I'm back to looking forward to it now, sounds great.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!