Unlikely wrote:Yeah but twice on the same page?
Facewon wrote:Nice. Very nice. Small thing around some of the historical things: isn't the land crossing to America now contested a little? I base this on headlines I've seen only.
hylian_elf wrote:Gazelle said "no right thread". By which he means that there is no right (or wrong) thread.
No.dynamiteReady wrote:While one can argue round the AGW.
dynamiteReady wrote:https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/science/2012/jul/03/climate-change-pascal-wager An old (ish) article that frames the current AGW debate in similar terms to Pascal's Wager.
AlsodynamiteReady wrote:https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/science/2012/jul/03/climate-change-pascal-wager
An old (ish) article that frames the current AGW debate in similar terms to Pascal's Wager.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!