The British Politics Thread
  • This Kate Middleton stuff is absolutely hilarious. Best thing the Royals have done.
  • For those with slightly better things to do with their life than follow it, she had mysterious 'abdominal surgery' and hasn't really been seen since, apart from one pic of her looking rough in a car. Cue wild conspiracies that she's dead or left William because he loves it up the bum.

    To silence the gossip of the proles, the Palace released a mother's day photo of her and her little brats. Supposedly taken by William. Conspiracist meltdown as the image is examined in microscopic detail and finds all sorts of Photoshop errors and possible AI weirdness. Now Reuters and the Associated Press have stopped distributing the image due to 'manipulation'.
  • Hahaha.
    That's both amazing and somewhat concerning
    Not everything is The Best or Shit. Theres many levels between that, lets just enjoy stuff.
  • monkey wrote:
    The Tories on 18% is the lowest poll I've seen and it probably won't happen. But a result in that ballpark is grounds for some very mild optimism. The Tories would get 50 seats maybe. Reform probably none, or a handful at best. Labour up in the 400s. The only opposition that matters at that point is the left wing of Labour. They won't have much power mind. Probably as much any other opposition.  More importantly that result would be the obliteration of Toryism. They'll be fighting against Reform. Get a trans-obsessed racist twat for a leader. More of their voters will die off. They'll still have to say how great Brexit has been. Younger voters won't forgive them in 5 years. It's going to be a proper toxic brand. Maybe a lost cause. At which point, a new moderate right-wing party (or the Lib Dems) might try and steal in, rather than leave the space open to Farage.  So, at that point, Labour can do what they want. Give it a year or two and they can spend what they need. Cook the books however they want. Unfortunately what they want seems not very good (they'll sell off bits of the NHS early doors to get some money in). But it's not going to do them any good electorally to stick to the fiction of austerity. And they won't have to. They'll be the Government and have the power to change people's minds about it. After 5 years in power, voters won't be judging Labour on how closely they stuck to Jeremy Hunt's 2024 budget.  I'm not sure I've completely convinced myself with all of that. But anything like that election result is a big win for erm something.
    More likely scenario, based on what's actually going on in the world: Labour spend 10 years doing next to fuck all to improve most people's lives (and the bigger their majority, the less they try). Far-right narratives gain more traction. The Tories move further to the right and get voted back in once they find a competent leader.

    The idea that one might celebrate a rise in the fascist vote is baffling to me. The higher that percentage goes, the more credibility a party like Reform gathers.
  • Rev wrote:
    Ironically Socialism has always been something rich people enjoy and benefit from the most. Most bailouts occur because Rich people can't handle money properly and get a huge handout so they don't pay for their actions.
    That's not socialism, it's neoliberalism, according to which the state exists primarily to ensure that the markets continue to function. In fact, if neoliberalism worked as originally intended, the state would actually be more involved in balancing the markets than it is - for example, intervening to break up monopolies/strangleholds on the market. It's just that in reality it's an internally contradictory system - it inevitably leads to huge accumulations of capital in the hands of a small number of people who can then influence politics/the state.
  • The notion that Toryism the set of policy behaviours will perish under this Labour era seems unserious.
    Do I want my spiteful mismanagement hot or lukewarm, who can say.
  • JonB wrote:
    More likely scenario, based on what's actually going on in the world: Labour spend 10 years doing next to fuck all to improve most people's lives (and the bigger their majority, the less they try). Far-right narratives gain more traction. The Tories move further to the right and get voted back in once they find a competent leader.

    The idea that one might celebrate a rise in the fascist vote is baffling to me. The higher that percentage goes, the more credibility a party like Reform gathers.
    If the route to getting back to over 40% of the vote involved going further to the right, the Tories would be there by now.
    Reform are grubby little bigots, just like the Tories, and UKIP got 13% in the 2015 election. It's not a rise in the fascist vote, it's the racist and / or moron vote getting split. And yes I want them as evenly split as possible. Edit - Reform outperforming them is probably preferable given the amount of Tory safe seats.
  • Brooks wrote:
    The notion that Toryism the set of policy behaviours will perish under this Labour era seems unserious.
    Do I want my spiteful mismanagement hot or lukewarm, who can say.
    Change won't come from Labour. The electorate creates the pressure to change, and with the Tories gone / divided, there's less weight pulling the other way. They go where they think the votes are.
  • Jon's observation is correct. The pendulum just keeps swinging ever more to the right as the system is systemically out of balance.
    Steam: Ruffnekk
    Windows Live: mr of unlocking
    Fightcade2: mrofunlocking
  • Poll after poll tells Labour things like increased investment and nationalisation are popular. And they don’t offer them. Resolutely refusing to turn even a millimetre leftwards whilst decrying those who insist they should is their entire deal.

    Reeves, Starmer, Streeting, McFadden, the rotting corpse of Blair lurking in the background … nothing good is coming from these horrible people.
  • davyK
    Show networks
    Xbox
    davyK13
    Steam
    dbkelly

    Send message
    I'm not sure how increased investment and nationalisation are going to be possible due to the fuck up that we are in. Government borrowing is cagey after that dickhead Truss almost toppled the whole fucking idea of bonds.  So it means tax raises - and that requires revolutionary changes to get the super rich to play their part.
    Holding the wrong end of the stick since 2009.
  • davyK
    Show networks
    Xbox
    davyK13
    Steam
    dbkelly

    Send message
    hmmm... interesting.
    Holding the wrong end of the stick since 2009.
  • It's not cheap mind. But it's not impossibly expensive. Dirt cheap debt was available in the early 2010s. It was almost free at one point. That's a historic missed opportunity. The Tories wouldn't be looking at polls that show them on 18% now if they'd spent some money on green industrial development then. And we wouldn't have spent the last 14 years with flatline growth.
  • davyK
    Show networks
    Xbox
    davyK13
    Steam
    dbkelly

    Send message
    Don't think anyone doubts the cost.  The information war needs to be won if anything close to what's needed to get services back on track is to be done; let alone considering renationalisation of anything.
    Holding the wrong end of the stick since 2009.
  • If only Gordon Brown hadn't caused a global financial crisis.
  • 30p Lee has fucked off to Reform.
  • davyK wrote:
    Don't think anyone doubts the cost.  The information war needs to be won if anything close to what's needed to get services back on track is to be done; let alone considering renationalisation of anything.

    They don’t even want to take part in the war (Labour I mean). They want to default into office via conforming to every rightwing media expectation and supplicating to every business and establishment demand.

    These people won’t fight for you, me or anything. They’re in it for themselves.

    They’re scum, just of a different variety to the Conservatives. IMO, etc.
  • davyK
    Show networks
    Xbox
    davyK13
    Steam
    dbkelly

    Send message
    Conflicts of interest.

    And maintaining the status quo - precisely what Conservativism is.

    Or at least what it is supposed to be about - the last 10 years have seen even that agenda come off the rails.  Maintaining the status quo as it is now simply isn't acceptable.
    Holding the wrong end of the stick since 2009.
  • Going to have one more stab at this thing about that poll because the replies seem to be missing the point of what I’m trying to say.

    Until the rich get taxed, nothing gets fixed. Current Labour aren't doing that. Current Labour will replace the Chancellor from being a man who studied PPE at Oxford to a woman who studied PPE at Oxford and hail it as a groundbreaking triumph for equality. They’re shameless, vote-chasing, lying shits. 

    They’re matching the Tories. That’s their game. The less distance between them, the less they can be attacked. What do they do when the Tories are gone? What’s the next grift? In a country that’s fucked from four and a half decades of neoliberalism. Pretend fixes don’t cut it anymore. There aren’t any right-wing economic solutions left. It’s all progressive now. The economy needs rebalancing. Do they try and fix some of the problems? Or do they still carry on copying the party that’s suffered a historic defeat, are a million miles from power, and probably locked in a racist death spiral with Farage, or even led by the cunt. Is that where the votes are?

    So it’s not about Labour. It’s about the political environment any government finds itself in after a result like that. I take Jon’s point though that a big majority could well be a safety net for them and they end up doing jack. The Tories not being a threat for ten years could well increase that likelihood. It’s at least as likely as my more optimistic scenario.    

    It’s not lost on me that the ‘Labour will swing left in office’ chat is dead now. I think people have seen enough of them and are like ‘nah they’re just shit aren’t they’.
  • A less controversial benefit of Torygeddon is that it would be an all-time warning to future governments about how corrupt and terrible you get to be. So that's another small win.
  • And finally, after a decade and a half of those ubercunts, I want to see them suffer and will very much enjoy it.
  • I agree totally (on taxing the rich), but I just don’t believe Labour will agree. Piss poor, third way ‘neoliberalism’ (for want of a better word) is all they have.

    They’re not bright or capable people, these are the dregs at the bottom of the Blairite barrel. They couldn’t think their way out of a paper bag because their entire careers were based on saying the right things to the right people and consequently being allowed to climb up the career ladder as a reward. I could see them taking a few hesitant steps towards better politics, possibly, if the situation demanded it (and it will) but they’ll constantly be hamstrung by their own inherent cowardice and sensibleness (the word used as it is in the media, where repeating the same mistakes for decades on end is somehow ‘sensible’).

    (I hope I’m wrong as y’know, me & my loved ones have to live in this terrible broken country too)
  • It's probably theoretical anyway. Can't see the Tories ending up lower than the mid 20s once the tabloid scares and the usual stuff properly cranks up. A lot of the straying Tory voters will return, knowing they'll lose but want them to be an opposition to Starmer, with a 'better' leader than Sunak.
  • At the current rate of attrition, it might not be Sunaks choice when an election gets called.
  • https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/mar/11/biggest-tory-donor-looking-diane-abbott-hate-all-black-women
    The Conservative party’s biggest donor told colleagues that looking at Diane Abbott makes you “want to hate all black women” and said the MP “should be shot”, the Guardian can reveal.

    Should have given those donations to Labour, a party that’s serious about hating Diane Abbott.
  • If any of us said that (not saying we actually would), we would be immediately fired and likely face prosecution for hate crimes

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!