The British Politics Thread
  • Rev wrote:
    If Sunak does that he better find a planet that supports life because if he takes away my kids rights then I'm going to get really angry on social media about it.

    What kind of rights are you referring to?  Brexit already fucked a lot of our kid's rights off.
    [quote="Moot_Geeza"]I hope you've been putting lotto tickets on recently Kris. You're overdue a bit of luck. [/quote]
  • What kind of rights are you referring to?  Brexit already fucked a lot of our kid's rights off.
    If he leaves the ECHR then we lose our right to life. TO live without persecution, to have kids, and so on..
    Sometimes here. Sometimes Lurk. Occasionally writes a bad opinion then deletes it before posting..
  • There isnt time left before the GE to leave the ECHR.
    Labour have committed to repealing this Rwanda thing.
    Without the Rwanda thing the need to leave the ECHR loses its focus.
    By 2030 nobody will be talking about the Rwanda deal other than what a colossal failure it was, probably in the context of Sunak's legacy and who was worse him or Truss.


    We only leave the ECHR if the Tories are re-elected in the next GE which is highly, highly unlikely.
  • Pie in the sky nonsense, but what do we have in place to ensure that he holds a general election? They've shown quite clearly that they'll ignore laws to suit their agenda. Currently it looks like this General Election is likely to wipe on the Tory party and potentially prevent it from gaining power for years to come. Is there anything stopping Sunak claiming some kind of national emergency to prevent the election being run?
    Sometimes here. Sometimes Lurk. Occasionally writes a bad opinion then deletes it before posting..
  • davyK
    Show networks
    Xbox
    davyK13
    Steam
    dbkelly

    Send message
    What should happen is that the loony fraternity leave the Conservative party for Reform after(before?) the next GE (which has been harboured there for decades, tolerated by moderates).

    The loonies in Reform will wither on the vine into obscurity  as long as the moderate Tories get a proper leader in place who faces down the idiots Johnson let out of the cage. Having fuckwits like Truss in Reform shouting from the cheap seats to whoever will listen will only accelerate that. It will happen. It's wrong to think all Tories are evil cunts. It simply isn't the case even if you don't agree with their (the moderates) policies.

    If they don't leave, clinging onto the carcass of the Tory party in some sort of deluded belief in that it will give them validity, the new leader needs to either fuck them out or put them back in the cage.  The party needs to come back in some form as we all need an opposition in the house.

    It's what labour went through in the 80s until Kinnock screwed himself booting out his loonies. Coming to the centre annoyed a lot of people but it was the only way. And it's the only way the Tories have to come back.

    btw I have no idea who a new leader would be, such is the damage that Johnson has done to the party. He completely hollowed out the cabinet and it's possible that the viable talent has left. But the party has to stop playing to the right wing gallery which is now visibly corrupt and in the pocket of industry lobbyists.

    The loony left was a thing. We have the loony right now (or rancid right if you want alliteration).
    Holding the wrong end of the stick since 2009.
  • Rev wrote:
    Pie in the sky nonsense, but what do we have in place to ensure that he holds a general election? They've shown quite clearly that they'll ignore laws to suit their agenda. Currently it looks like this General Election is likely to wipe on the Tory party and potentially prevent it from gaining power for years to come. Is there anything stopping Sunak claiming some kind of national emergency to prevent the election being run?
    He would need to explicitly change the law in parliament. Parliament dissolves automatically in December (I think). Then a General Election happens automatically. It's not really something he can ignore. Parliament wouldn't be there, there would no MPs and they aren't even allowed in the building after dissolution. So, whatever his pretext (e.g. national emergency) he needs to go into Parliament and get a majority of MPs to vote to extend it.
  • davyK
    Show networks
    Xbox
    davyK13
    Steam
    dbkelly

    Send message
    Sunak is a an empty vessel. He has nothing.

    So he is riding this Rwanda madness until the end. Right over the cliff edge.

    The local elections next week might see the end of him but it won't make any difference now. Anyone stupid enough to step up now would only make things worse.  It's fascinating to see - and I was around to watch the John Major "back to basics" implosion.

    Fact remains - power corrupts. The 7 year rule still applies.
    Holding the wrong end of the stick since 2009.
  • ZMM wrote:
    Don't think people truly understand the implications of a government shattering the balance of powers in this so called democracy. They won't stop here if they are allowed to succeed.
    I'm struggling to care. It's the last pathetic and desperate act of a dying government. It will all be undone in weeks of Labour taking over.

  • monkey wrote:
    Rev wrote:
    Pie in the sky nonsense, but what do we have in place to ensure that he holds a general election? They've shown quite clearly that they'll ignore laws to suit their agenda. Currently it looks like this General Election is likely to wipe on the Tory party and potentially prevent it from gaining power for years to come. Is there anything stopping Sunak claiming some kind of national emergency to prevent the election being run?
    He would need to explicitly change the law in parliament. Parliament dissolves automatically in December (I think). Then a General Election happens automatically. It's not really something he can ignore. Parliament wouldn't be there, there would no MPs and they aren't even allowed in the building after dissolution. So, whatever his pretext (e.g. national emergency) he needs to go into Parliament and get a majority of MPs to vote to extend it.

    This.
    The Gov can call an election early but parliament will dissolve 5 years to the day after it formed post the last GE.
    If he squatted in NO10 he wouldn't be able to do much. Laws require Royal assent so Chuck would have to be in on it too, he's a useless old fuck but I think even this would be too much for the Royals to swallow, not least because a dictator is a threat to their own power, dictators tend to remove royal families.

    They could change the law beyond 5 years but that's not happening, not this close to a GE, would be seen the same as squatting.

    Taken to the extreme nothing stops this happening in any country of course, laws of are written by men and can be broken. Takes someone with a bit more about them than Rishi though. Trump, maybe.
  • monkey wrote:
    ZMM wrote:
    Don't think people truly understand the implications of a government shattering the balance of powers in this so called democracy. They won't stop here if they are allowed to succeed.
    I'm struggling to care. It's the last pathetic and desperate act of a dying government. It will all be undone in weeks of Labour taking over.

    Wouldn't be so sure that Starmer's Labour would do that. They've already said they won't repeal the protest laws.
  • davyK
    Show networks
    Xbox
    davyK13
    Steam
    dbkelly

    Send message
    Bear in mind it's also now the party that lied to QE2.

    The legacy of this downward spiral of an administration since Cameron is rancid. There won't be a single iota of societal advancement from it, apart from warnings for future generations about demagogues in power and maybe consideration of a written constitution to make sure this can't happen again.

    An end to career politicians, conflicts of interest - declared or otherwise and the revolving door that facilitates rapid movement between industry , high public service and government. And the House of Lords needs reformed, at the very least to rid it of the pollutant that has been injected into it since Johnson.
    Holding the wrong end of the stick since 2009.
  • ZMM wrote:
    monkey wrote:
    ZMM wrote:
    Don't think people truly understand the implications of a government shattering the balance of powers in this so called democracy. They won't stop here if they are allowed to succeed.
    I'm struggling to care. It's the last pathetic and desperate act of a dying government. It will all be undone in weeks of Labour taking over.

    Wouldn't be so sure that Starmer's Labour would do that. They've already said they won't repeal the protest laws.
    They've already said they'll get rid of the Rwanda stuff. They don't want to leave the ECHR. This is ultra-right Tory shite. Starmer's not interested and neither are the centre right-wing voters he's targeting.
  • No one is interested in leaving the ECHR. Its fringe of the fringe of the fringe stuff.
  • b0r1s
    Show networks
    Xbox
    b0r1s
    PSN
    ib0r1s
    Steam
    ib0r1s

    Send message
    Don’t forget. Next week folks: https://stopthetories.vote/

    Bookmark it.
  • Cross posted from the Palestine and Middle East Thread 
    So it turns out that the Zionist Gideon Falter who appeared on mainstream news as the man who tried to cross the Palestinian marches in London and then released edited footage of the incident is the same person who is heavily involved in the CAA. The Campaign Against Antisemitism. The same Gideon Falter who made the complaint to Keir Starmer about Jeremy Corbyn and got him suspended from Labour.
    Sometimes here. Sometimes Lurk. Occasionally writes a bad opinion then deletes it before posting..
  • davyK
    Show networks
    Xbox
    davyK13
    Steam
    dbkelly

    Send message
    Well... "Wee Jeffrey" made his first court appearance today. His wife is also accused for aiding and abetting the alleged sexual assaults.

    Jeffrey all front - turning up with his Christian / salmon badge on the lapel.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-68881483
    Holding the wrong end of the stick since 2009.
  • Rev wrote:
    Cross posted from the Palestine and Middle East Thread  So it turns out that the Zionist Gideon Falter who appeared on mainstream news as the man who tried to cross the Palestinian marches in London and then released edited footage of the incident is the same person who is heavily involved in the CAA. The Campaign Against Antisemitism. The same Gideon Falter who made the complaint to Keir Starmer about Jeremy Corbyn and got him suspended from Labour.



    This is hilarious, particularly when Gideon realises he has lost the argument and has been completely exposed at the 8 minute mark. Absolute twat he is.
  • Is that the "I don't want to talk to you anymore" video? The number of people who you would think would be on his side are staunchly very much not. Which makes Suella's cuntish idiocy in support of him the other day ... well ... cuntish.
  • Well, quite. When you’re playing from the Tommy Robinson/ Stephen Yaxley-Lennon playbook, and you look around you and all the people “on your side” are fucking nightmare pieces of shit, maybe you should have a moment of introspection and reconsider some things. Then again, to get there in the first place you gotta be beyond that, so I doubt he will change.
  • davyK
    Show networks
    Xbox
    davyK13
    Steam
    dbkelly

    Send message
    Hopefully a taste of the upcoming GE - many remember the 97 election and the Portillo exit but the real treat of the night was the defeat of the odious David Mellor.

    Times: 
    15'37'' result announcement (watch Mellor's face)
    26'15'' Mellor's defeat acceptance speech and slagging off James Goldsmith (the referendum party !!)

    Holding the wrong end of the stick since 2009.
  • In Parliament today, the Tories have tabled more than 200 amendments to the Renters Reform Bill, essentially gutting it and rendering it pointless. I wonder why?
  • Gove's job has been 'Minister of ensure it doesn't happen' for a while now.
    He did a marvellous job of ensuring leveling up was at best nothing.
  • davyK wrote:
    Hopefully a taste of the upcoming GE - many remember the 97 election and the Portillo exit but the real treat of the night was the defeat of the odious David Mellor. Times:  15'37'' result announcement (watch Mellor's face) 26'15'' Mellor's defeat acceptance speech and slagging off James Goldsmith (the referendum party !!)

    Why are so many of these Brexit cunts foreign born and/or live/work abroad? Goldsmith was a French born, at the time French MEP who lived in Mexico after building up an American business empire and died at a property he had in Spain.
  • LivDiv wrote:
    Gove's job has been 'Minister of ensure it doesn't happen' for a while now. He did a marvellous job of ensuring leveling up was at best nothing.

    More than 100 MPs earn £10,000 a year as landlords. We are living in a sham democracy right now.
  • davyK
    Show networks
    Xbox
    davyK13
    Steam
    dbkelly

    Send message
    Why are so many of these Brexit cunts foreign born and/or live/work abroad? Goldsmith was a French born, at the time French MEP who lived in Mexico after building up an American business empire and died at a property he had in Spain.

    Clearly EU regs have always held gouging cunts at bay. Welcome to Brexit. The oul cunt died years ago so at least he didn't see it.
    Holding the wrong end of the stick since 2009.
  • Hope the election comes before they get a chance to drop it.
  • Doing it the right way, waiting for contracts to expire. Means it will cost nothing to bring each service back into public control.

    An important message to get non-lefties on board (pun) is that these companies are almost all foreign owned. These rip off fares are leaking money out of our economy weakening it. The money saved by rail users will stay in the country a lot longer and likely cycle through the exchequer several times too. Also makes the UK more attractive for tourism and people coming here to work.
  • Its a popular policy with all voters. No one likes the train operating companies.

    Given that we missed the window of cheap money thanks to 14 years of Tory cunts, not acquiring the rolling stock is the right move as well.
  • There are still a few that give it the old " guess you dont remember the 70s" routine
    No I don't you old fuck and neither do 90% of commuters because if they did odds are they would be retired.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!