nick_md wrote:Paul the sparky wrote:Your response to it was to ask for more response from others? Bizarre
Yes that's a response, I don't know if I can really explain this to you if it isn't getting through. Well done cross-thread sniping with two feet, studs up, though.
nick_md wrote:Paul the sparky wrote:Your response to it was to ask for more response from others? Bizarre
Yes that's a response, I don't know if I can really explain this to you if it isn't getting through. Well done cross-thread sniping with two feet, studs up, though.
Paul the sparky wrote:nick_md wrote:Paul the sparky wrote:Your response to it was to ask for more response from others? Bizarre
Yes that's a response, I don't know if I can really explain this to you if it isn't getting through. Well done cross-thread sniping with two feet, studs up, though.
You brought the other thread up. I'm just wondering what you find so objectionable about Fossildog's post that you think more people should be challenged yet won't challenge yourself. Can't get my head around it
nick_md wrote:RedDave2 wrote:nick_md wrote:I just meant the above post from mr. Dog deserves more forum response than a m$!
So, Fossildog single post is way worse than Indigo.
What am I meant to be challenging here? Can you fill my boots for me please Sparkles?
Nick, don't want to start this in another thread but no one was responding to indigo because of his posts relating to Microsoft or M$. If you really think that you've complete missed why people got a bit peeved with him.
Ok but the point stands. The post from FD above is way, way, way worse than anything indigo posted. I can remove the m$ if needed, was being flippant and you're right to call me on it.
nick_md wrote:Christ I only wanted to point out a toxic poster ITT and made a reference to today's hot topic to highlight we have bigger fish to fry (FD), I didn't think I'd be attacked. I thought I was doing a unifying gesture. Apologies.
Lord_Griff wrote:He thinks Scotland will be fine once they have independence.
RedDave2 wrote:nick_md wrote:RedDave2 wrote:nick_md wrote:I just meant the above post from mr. Dog deserves more forum response than a m$!
So, Fossildog single post is way worse than Indigo.
What am I meant to be challenging here? Can you fill my boots for me please Sparkles?
Nick, don't want to start this in another thread but no one was responding to indigo because of his posts relating to Microsoft or M$. If you really think that you've complete missed why people got a bit peeved with him.
Ok but the point stands. The post from FD above is way, way, way worse than anything indigo posted. I can remove the m$ if needed, was being flippant and you're right to call me on it.nick_md wrote:Christ I only wanted to point out a toxic poster ITT and made a reference to today's hot topic to highlight we have bigger fish to fry (FD), I didn't think I'd be attacked. I thought I was doing a unifying gesture. Apologies.
Again, maybe we are both looking at this in different ways. Indigo was temp blocked only because of his actions not his comments. It wasnt that he insulted someone or said something bold - I took it that he was shut down for a bit because he kept coming back to try to start insult trading with people who didn't want to.
From my viewpoint it was his frequent posts which contained nothing but insults that caused the issue not the insults themsepves. In relation to FD I think most here ignored FD from the start which is grand but if FD had kept posting it and interrupting the trade, maybe things would have followed a similar run.
Paul the sparky wrote:Why is he making out like he's being attacked? It's all very confusing
Paul the sparky wrote:Why is he making out like he's being attacked? It's all very confusing
nick_md wrote:Can't believe this Fossildog guy crawls out and we go ham in the Xbox thread
Let's be like Master Chief and Arbiter and take on the real enemy eh xx
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!