LivDiv wrote:It suggests they are shit at artwork rather than anything more nefarious.
Pfft. They probably outsourced it to donor-run company for a couple of million.poprock wrote:No, it’s the sort of thing that happens when you have a professional do the first image then realise you need to change it at the last minute and ask the secretary to do it.
JonB wrote:Pfft. They probably outsourced it to donor-run company for a couple of million.poprock wrote:No, it’s the sort of thing that happens when you have a professional do the first image then realise you need to change it at the last minute and ask the secretary to do it.
poprock wrote:Nah, it’s an amateur opening up a JPG/PNG file and painting out the original text with a brush that wasn’t set to 100% opacity from the last time it was used. They’re on a cheap dark monitor screen so it looks to them like the job’s done.
acemuzzy wrote:I downloaded the original tweet and in Paint filled the background red, and the trump text was visible. Even without playing with brightness. So yeah it ain't fake.
Lurch666 wrote:Just tried it myself and got the same. Still puzzled why the original text is smaller and above the new text. If it was a botch job I would have thought the old text would be under the new text. Unless they moved the old text for some reason then didn't cover it properly.acemuzzy wrote:I downloaded the original tweet and in Paint filled the background red, and the trump text was visible. Even without playing with brightness. So yeah it ain't fake.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!