hunk wrote:Immigration has to stop even if it means tearing the UK apart?
hunk wrote:Not for the subset who planned and financed Brexit..... Libertarian utopia is within grasp..
I respectfully disagree.Yossarian wrote:No deal would be a complete and utter disaster for the U.K. Anything that avoids it is better by default.
monkey wrote:This guy seems to have it figured out. https://twitter.com/bbcnewsnight/status/1065742639931154433?s=21
Yossarian wrote:Fortunately there aren’t enough of them to force it through.Not for the subset who planned and financed Brexit..... Libertarian utopia is within grasp..
LivDiv wrote:I respectfully disagree.Yossarian wrote:No deal would be a complete and utter disaster for the U.K. Anything that avoids it is better by default.
I don't think there is much in it. It's a cat shit sandwich or a dog shit sandwich.
Short term no deal will be worse unless we negotiate a very good transition period, which is possible.
Deal, I can't see how we can operate successfully while under the thumb of the EU. I also see it creating a lot of social issues where the brexiteers won't be happy leading to us going further right as a nation, blaming the brexit deal in a Treaty of Versailles manner.
RedDave2 wrote:Wouldn't no deal mean no transition period? At least that was my understanding of it.
Yossarian wrote:I can’t see any scenario where a no-deal Brexit would get through Parliament. It’s tricky to raise a majority for economic suicide.
MAYDAY: Secret Whitehall contingency plans reveal Britain would start to run out of clean drinking water within days of a No Deal Brexit, as “just in time” purifying chemicals cannot be stockpiled: https://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/article-6425479/Michael-Gove-backed-hearing-UK-run-drinking-water-DAYS-No-Deal.html
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!