XOMuggins wrote:hinges entirely on the feelings of the listener. Like if you are made to remember what crimes the individual is supposed to have committed, that's on you, not the singer.
XOMuggins wrote:Not saying there isn't good music outside of rap. Am saying it is the dominant genre, which it is.cockbeard wrote:Now that's where you fell over, might just be me, but I find plenty of very good music to listen to outisde of rap. Guess I've just been ridiculously lucky, but the actual rap stuff I do listen to ends up being late nineties or grime Maybe R-Kelly is the greatest thing since sliced bread but to my mind he's not as sexy as LL Cool J, not as summery as Slick Rick, and not as dark as Ice Cube, and not as pop as SkeeLoXOMuggins wrote:His impact on Rap alone - surely uncontested as THE genre of today
XOMuggins wrote:R. Kelly is the most important musician of his generation, regardless of genre. That just is. It's not up for debate and does not bend to the whims of the individual.
Brooks wrote:If you'd told me in the mind '90s the singer in Smashing Pumpkins would wind up a blob that owns a wrestling company I'd have made a remarkable noise and physical gesture.
I can't hate on that trajectory.
Diluted Dante wrote:Well, owns is currently up in the air.Brooks wrote:If you'd told me in the mind '90s the singer in Smashing Pumpkins would wind up a blob that owns a wrestling company I'd have made a remarkable noise and physical gesture. I can't hate on that trajectory.
Fair enough. I'm just pointing out that Kells doesn't actually have that many songs which bring up this issue. Yes, there is a lot of sex in his music but it is all consensual, loving or just plain ridiculous. Didn't mean to get aggressive. Not my intention.Facewon wrote:But I'm not really trying to make an argument other than this is why I think I, and probably other folk, struggle with some artists and not others. The thread is discussing how folks feel about artists with morally questionable acts in their history and how folks feel about the art and/or artist. I'll put my hand up and say I am irrational and inconsistent about artists for various reasons around this stuff. I don't buy the complete separation arguments and I don't buy that there isn't a point where you can be justified in going fuck x's art because of Y action. If Gary glitter had a song called I love to fuck kids, or saville had one called corpse fucker I struggle to see how folks could seperate shit. Anyhoo.XOMuggins wrote:hinges entirely on the feelings of the listener. Like if you are made to remember what crimes the individual is supposed to have committed, that's on you, not the singer.
SpaceGazelle wrote:"I'm a cookie monster, break your back, crack it open like a lobster."
I'd go as far as to say that isn't even art, never mind any crustacean moral implications.
trippy wrote:'It's like Jurassic Park, but I'm your sexasaurus.' I can't think of anything in the history of music to top that.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!