Escape wrote:It was the Bone of its day.
Childintime wrote:Generally lacking a wide library of decent titles but with intense fan communities built around the one or two games that are actually worth playing and an overrated pad?Escape wrote:It was the Bone of its day.
mistercrayon wrote:Street fighter fight pad?!
Andy wrote:retroking1981 wrote:To be blunt it's a piss taking rip off.
I also like to think anyone into retro, Nintendo specifically would have picked up a NES at some point.
I just struggle to see who it was aimed at other than them playing off the sort of Nintendo fan that buys anything with their name on it.
There are people out there, nostalgic about the NES they had as a kid, who aren't so into video games they want to buy an original NES, or faff about with emulation. Or people who didn't have a NES, but are keen to experience some of those games without having to buy an original NES or faff about with emulation.
It is a really convenient solution (criminally short controller cable aside). It takes up much less room and is much more appealing (to many) than a cigarette smoke stained NES with carts that may or may not work. Many people don't have a PC, let alone the knowledge (or desire) to waste time learning how to get emulators to work and finding the right ROMs.
I don't see what's so hard to understand about it's obvious appeal.
Liveinadive wrote:I'm convinced it would never have happened if Nintendo didn't have the awkward situation of the WiiU ending early, Zelda/Switch being March and having nothing for xmas.
I don't think it was an avenue they wanted to go down or will likely go down again any time soon.
I will give them their due, they did a good job of it (controller lead aside).
Childintime wrote:Escape wrote:It was the Bone of its day.
Generally lacking a wide library of decent titles but with intense fan communities built around the one or two games that are actually worth playing and an overrated pad?
Vela wrote:I thought the Saturn managed to outsell the PS1 in Japan for most of the gen.
ChopperByrne wrote:Childintime wrote:Generally lacking a wide library of decent titles but with intense fan communities built around the one or two games that are actually worth playing and an overrated pad?Escape wrote:It was the Bone of its day.
The Jap/Mk.II Saturn pads are legit, the best ever non-analog pad.
There's a reason the design is still copied so much today.
hylian_elf wrote:Oh, what is it about the Sat controllers desig that has been copied so much? I looked up the controller and can't see what it could be.
retroking1981 wrote:Have to agree with elf. There's no Saturn DNA in current pads from what I can see.
Yossarian wrote:What are you talking about? A/B/X/Y are in the same layout on the Xbox pad as the Saturn pad, the Saturn pad just has a C and Z tacked onto the right-hand side, the logical place for C and Z buttons, and one that isn't available to Nintendo and their backwards alphabet usage.
mistercrayon wrote:The true Abxy is on Super Nintendo.
Yossarian wrote:Also, that layout originated with the Megadrive 6 button pad, before even the DC.
Vela wrote:Yossarian wrote:Also, that layout originated with the Megadrive 6 button pad, before even the DC.
Yeah, but the 6 button pads didnt become standard til Saturn.
Yossarian wrote:mistercrayon wrote:The true Abxy is on Super Nintendo.
If it was so true, surely you'd be calling it 'the true Bayx', but you aren't, because that would be retarded.
Yossarian wrote:Or, if Nintendo had used the alphabet in alphabetical order the divide wouldn't exist. Blaming Microsoft for this seems bizarre, especially when, as you acknowledge, they weren't even the first company to use the alphabet correctly on buttons.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!