Dante, I've never though of it being used as a currency for the masses, I don't think that idea has any legs. As a cryptocurrency it will still exist and be used on Internet by some but not the masses.
The tech is in its infancy and alot of pilot work is going on. R3 is a consortium of the world's biggest financial institutions. They are throwing in upwards of £100mil a year on blockchain technology and the underlying protocols that will allow said institutions to talk to each other (move money) digitally with lower costs.
Microsoft, IBM, RSA and other big companies are part of the decentralized identity foundation who are looking at how we secure identity, (human and non human*) on the blockchain.
Microsoft and IBM are also members of the Smart Contract Alliance who are looking at how Smart Contracts can be legally implemented and audited. They are working with the USA digital chamber of commerce on this as well.
*non human, they are looking to tokenise objects and services on the blockchain so any and every item can have an identity and that helps with supply chain and auditing. For example you can tokenise a screwdriver from manufacturer x and give it a blockchain identity.
Walmart did a recent test where they tried to trace back a crate of mangos to the farm of origin. It took them over 6 days to go through paperwork, audit trails etc. If that was on the blockchain they'd have their answer in minutes.
In china, they are trialling baby food on blockchain. Because there is alot of fake baby food and it kills or severely injures babies. By adding a QR code or RFID to the tin and sealing it, a mum in China can go buy baby food, scan the QR code and be assured that the tin of baby food hasnt been tampered with as its history on the supply chain is recorded in the blockchain.
Diluted Dante wrote:Perhaps this is a problem with the name then, but what is a cryptocurreny used for, if not as currency?
Dinostar77 wrote:I forgot to add, companies are using cryptocurrency as a method for gaining startup capital in order to bring their ideas to market. Like an IPO. it's just that this area is unregulated at the moment and when it gets regulated we will all be better off.
Also your not the generation I'm talking about, the generation I'm talking about are the current under 10 yrs old.
legaldinho wrote:Dinostar77 wrote:I forgot to add, companies are using cryptocurrency as a method for gaining startup capital in order to bring their ideas to market. Like an IPO. it's just that this area is unregulated at the moment and when it gets regulated we will all be better off.
Also your not the generation I'm talking about, the generation I'm talking about are the current under 10 yrs old.
It's not unregulated, it's illegal. Just the SEC only sends letters in some cases. I even cited one a few pages ago - but, you know, never mind the facts eh.
monkey wrote:The under 10s aren’t going to have serious purchasing power for decades. Thirty or more years until they buy a house etc. Most people don’t know how money works, or what it represents or what money supply is. This is all abstracted away from them. Same with email, internet, social networks. Crypto currencies will either work or they won’t but it won’t have anything to do with being too complex for the average joe. They’ve still got the use case hurdle to clear (edit - and the structural problem of how to stabilise the value without centralised control over supply). If that happens it just needs someone to come up with the right mechanism for people using them quickly and easily.
Yossarian wrote:Dino, genuine question here: you’ve been talking about investing in crypto, but also about crypto not necessarily equalling currency and the things that can be done with the underlying tech. So if your investments aren’t currency speculation but are investments in blockchain tech, what are these investments you’re making? Are you buying shares in companies working with blockchain tech? Is there some blockchain based investment system in companies working with this tech?
Yossarian wrote:I don’t think that social media is a good analogy for Cryptocurrency, TBH. Social media allowed people to do things that they couldn’t before, there is very little being offered to the individual by Cryptocurrency that makes it more useful than money.
Dinostar77 wrote:Whereas our generation are abit more savy about security and posting everything and anything on social media.
Dinostar77 wrote:Diluted Dante wrote:Perhaps this is a problem with the name then, but what is a cryptocurreny used for, if not as currency?
Dante there is a whole ecosystem of other uses. Some valid some dubious. If your curious go on https://www.coingecko.com/en, click a currency and read its description. Read a dozen or so from the top 200 and you'll get an idea of what else exists outside of currency uses.
How do you know?GooberTheHat wrote:that is not why the vast majority of people are purchasing these tokens.
A hard fork between those that want to discuss how crypto & Blockchain is evolving, leaving this thread for people to discuss how right they are going to be about tulips.WorKid wrote:Don't hard fork the thread.
AndCallMeCharlie wrote:How do you know?GooberTheHat wrote:that is not why the vast majority of people are purchasing these tokens.
GooberTheHat wrote:Of all the tokens you have purchased which, if any, do you hold because of their intended purpose, and which do you hold because you think they will increase in value and you will be able to sell them for a profit?
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!