mistercrayon wrote:Maybe he’s just getting a haircut.
retroking1981 wrote:This is why I tend to side with 3 over World more often than not. Plus it pushed the NES to the limits, as amazing as World is from a design POV I don't think the SNES ever went past first or second gear with it.davyK wrote:SMW doesn't look attractive so begin with but the more you play it the more you appreciate the design. SMB was revolutionary while SMW was a further refinement of 3. But SMW feels more polished.
Yossarian wrote:I am in the process of getting slightly wasted at home for FNF, so at some point tonight it might suddenly seem amusing to me to vote for PH.
Let more sober Yoss step in now to say that if I do vote in this at any point this evening, please disregard it.
XOX.
Moot_Geeza wrote:Breath of the Wild. Not my cup of tea on paper but it was an undeniably impressive and enjoyable experience. If they get the sequel 'right' - for me: overhaul the combat, tweak the cooking and weapon degradation, add a smattering of traditional dungeons, bring back some iconic Zelda items - it's a shoo-in for the top of future best game ever lists imho. Chances are they'll do something different and it'll end up there anyway. Excite.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!