Fair point, noted.Yossarian wrote:Reasonable post Dave, but the term coloured isn’t considered acceptable any more. https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/coloured-offensive-why-term-greg-clarke-fa-chairman-what-say-comments-resigned-756234
Roujin wrote:Dave, that example is a complete whataboutery. Are men sexually assaulted (or worse) by other men because they refuse to give them a cigarette? No they are not. A big problem with the discussions we NEED to have as men, come from this "not all men" narrative, which appears every time something like this happens. It derails the conversation and diverts attention from the problem. The problem is that because men grow up in a patriarchy, we have a level of privilege (uh oh I said the P word) that women do not enjoy and that bestows upon us both a confidence, and a lack of a need to think about our actions, because of that position. The issue is not that you can't ask someone out for a drink. The issue is that men do not need to think about their consequences of their actions, because the consequences frequently don't happen to them, they happen to the other person. It's quite easy for example, to know if it's okay to approach someone in public, if the other person is minding their own business and is not dropping huge social cues your way like extended eye contact, then they are minding their own business. I don't expect randoms to approach me when I'm out and talk to me about anything (beggars etc notwithstanding, but that's a different societal problem for another day), so why would I expect women who are minding their own business, even if they are in a bar to want me to start talking to them about anything if they haven't made any kind of hint towards it? I think this video here, starting from the timestamp at 14:22, sums up the problem we have really well. Men, have a responsibility to stop the unacceptable behaviour of other men, just allowing the behaviour to slide because you know the guy, isn't enough, why don't more men want to solve our problem?
Roujin wrote:I'll be honest, I don't understand why you needed to provide a totally different example based on someone who was fearful of black people, because people are talking about the issues affecting women, not different races. Because in that instance, you are 100% a bigot if you are scared of black people just because they are black and you are worried they are gonna beat you up if you don't give them a smoke or walk through a black neighbourhood as a white person. The characteristic of being black, has no bearing on how someone might treat you, unlike an exchange between a man and a woman.
No one is saying asking someone out is sexual harassment, women are saying that if they are out and a dude just walks up to them and asks them out that they feel harassed by that. Which is fair, let me just go an dig out my old friend Mr. Dictionary and read up what harassment means. Oh look, harassment means unwanted behaviour which you find offensive or which makes you feel intimidated or humiliated.
You talk about how if the fear of men is so extreme that it is not the actions of the man in question, but it is the action of the man in question, when the question is "Do women like men coming up to them out of the blue and asking them out?" and a chunk of them say that they don't like that whenever they are asked about it, but dudes are still out here trying it on anyway and even more guys are on the sidelines pontificating about how they don't understand how people are supposed to get their fuck on anymore if men can't walk up to women and start chatting them up uninvited.
There are lots of ways we can fix the problem, and part of that starts with men understanding that the balance of power in society and in personal interactions between men and women is not equal. Just because you wouldn't mind something, doesn't mean that women feel the same way about the same behaviour, you can start by just listening to women talking about their experiences of unpleasant encounters with men. If we are lucky we will be the last generations who have to deal with the kind of misogyny we have in society today, the internet has given enough people a voice, that the problem can't be swept under the rug anymore, but we won't make it if men keep thinking around the subject because they don't want to address the problems that we have created or allowed to perpetuate through our own inaction.
RedDave2 wrote:This act doesn't strike me as male exclusive behaviour but because of other events it carries an unpleasant edge if its a man doing it.
Roujin wrote:In my example both encounters are unpleasant. Just some random dude bowling up and striking up conversation uninvited might well be a pretty unpleasant experience. Edit - obvs the second encounter is probably WAAAAAAY more awful.
That's the problem, because misogyny has been completed swept under the rug for so long, and because it doesn't get talked about, most men think everything is probably going okay and you get people like Crayon wondering if now is the "good" era of men's treatment of women.
RedDave2 wrote:Edit: also honest question, and I'm not asking this because I'm some fucking love machine stud muffin, but can anyone say they have never been approached by a member of the opposite sex out of the blue in a night club or pub situation? This act doesn't strike me as male exclusive behaviour but because of other events it carries an unpleasant edge if its a man doing it.
Roujin wrote:Literally the only time a woman ever approached me on some night out was when I was a student and some fucking 50 year old collars me at the bar and starts chirpsing on and asking me if I liked Nirvana and shit because I was wearing a black hoodie and baggy jeans. Otherwise I am extremely repellent to women, they can like smell my beta hormones or something.RedDave2 wrote:Edit: also honest question, and I'm not asking this because I'm some fucking love machine stud muffin, but can anyone say they have never been approached by a member of the opposite sex out of the blue in a night club or pub situation? This act doesn't strike me as male exclusive behaviour but because of other events it carries an unpleasant edge if its a man doing it.
poprock wrote:I have had a three-hour briefing session from Police Scotland’s rape and sexual violence prevention team today.
60–70% of men are considered by the Police to be at risk of offending. Yes, 60–70% of all men. 60–70% of men in this thread, probably.
Just think about that for a minute. It why, if someone right here on this forum makes a joke about pulling on a night out or whatever and it feels a bit off, the rest of us have a fucking duty to call it out, because that is exactly how you begin to change things. You make it less accepted by personally not accepting it.
DrewMerson wrote:Stuff …
RedDave2 wrote:I think its fine to see someone in a sexual light (ok - not children, parents or siblings obviously) even if its with no intention of acting on it, without it verging into the same column as a sex object. Not sure how others feel on that one.
poprock wrote:RedDave2 wrote:I think its fine to see someone in a sexual light (ok - not children, parents or siblings obviously) even if its with no intention of acting on it, without it verging into the same column as a sex object. Not sure how others feel on that one.
Psychologists will tell you that sexual gratification is the fourth most powerful human need. The hard part is reminding all men that acting on that desire/need has to be consensual. You don’t have a right to gratification. Ever. The even harder part is educating on what consent actually means – and when it’s required. There’s a line. Don’t cross it. But where is that line? It’s in a different place in each person’s head. The work I’m going to do with the Police on this upcoming project is about a public campaign saying ‘legally, the line is here. No grey areas. Be in no doubt.’ (ie. it won’t be about morality. Just criminality.)
poprock wrote:Psychologists will tell you that sexual gratification is the fourth most powerful human need. The hard part is reminding all men that acting on that desire/need has to be consensual. You don’t have a right to gratification. Ever. The even harder part is educating on what consent actually means – and when it’s required. There’s a line. Don’t cross it. But where is that line? It’s in a different place in each person’s head. The work I’m going to do with the Police on this upcoming project is about a public campaign saying ‘legally, the line is here. No grey areas. Be in no doubt.’ (ie. it won’t be about morality. Just criminality.)RedDave2 wrote:I think its fine to see someone in a sexual light (ok - not children, parents or siblings obviously) even if its with no intention of acting on it, without it verging into the same column as a sex object. Not sure how others feel on that one.
RedDave2 wrote:Curious question Poprock - If a woman had said your girlfriend has lovely breasts would you have been offended? I know in this case the guy did turn out ot be a scumbag but women will often remark on how pretty another woman is and its not that uncommon a thing to hear.
DrewMerson wrote:RedDave2 wrote:Curious question Poprock - If a woman had said your girlfriend has lovely breasts would you have been offended? I know in this case the guy did turn out ot be a scumbag but women will often remark on how pretty another woman is and its not that uncommon a thing to hear.
There is a difference between paying a compliment to someone and making objectifying, dehumanising remarks about physical characteristics over which we have little or no control. In my experience, women will tend to compliment each other by commenting on how the other woman’s hair / make up / clothes really suit them rather than comment on the aesthetics of their mammary glands. I’m not saying it doesn’t happen, but direct remarks on physique tend to be limited to close friendships. Conversely, think about how often “that” is used in certain men’s language, regardless of whether it’s a woman across the street, or a work colleague. “Look at the arse on that,” or, “I’d bang that,” turn the women into objects. Phrases like, “She’d get it,” or, “I’d smash her back door in,” have undertones of violence and disregard notions of consent. Even if a man would not himself rape a woman, he’s helping cultivate a landscape in which other men think that their views on whether or not women have a right to say no are more widely tolerated and accepted.
Roujin wrote:Time to sink the sins thread haha
That's a hell of an If to try to gather useful data on, but I do wonder if the information space most of us live in now has made made this kind of anxiety more acute.If the fear of men is so extreme that it is not the action of the man in question but just the general experience that the woman has is in relation to men that makes her afraid than the problem is far beyond even these points. Men have effectively Woman fearful of all of us (and I'm not saying that it is not justified) Again, how on earth do you fix that? You arent looking to just fix behaviour, you need to fix perception as well.
Brooks wrote:I do wonder if the information space most of us live in now has made made this kind of anxiety more acute.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!