Syph79 wrote:Happy to help. I’ve done 3 years in public service and 12 in local government.Scout wrote:Yeah I'm worried she's not hitting all the buzzwords and specific requirements.
handsofblue wrote:I'm terrible for using the royal we at work. Mostly because I hate taking responsibility for shit.
Thanks a lot for this. When she's on to her next one I'll hopefully send something over to you. Much appreciated.lastant wrote:Would disagree with the Oxbridge comment personally, although that obviously depends on what department/area/grade you're looking to get into, but it certainly helps to be in the Civil Service to progress/move as there are plenty of jobs that are advertised internally across it. Knowing people can be useful in regards to networking and being aware of opportunities, but I'm not sure it's quite as 'old boy's club' as people might think and you'd be surprised at how open and fair the competition for posts is...I'm certainly yet to be given a nod and a wink in regards to easy progression and I'm into my seventeenth year of service! The How to Apply page of the Civil Service Careers website is worth reading through - when it comes to actually applying, every post will require an application that matches the behaviours selected as suitable for it*...as you've mentioned you'll need at least a 4 in each one** to progress past the sift. Is she following the STAR method***? You also need to get out of the habit of saying 'we', this is all about what you did to meet that example (I find that incredibly hard to do personally). In short, look at the Behaviours document and be sure that the examples you're providing match what they're looking for for each one. Can't promise miracles but am happy to have a look over examples if you want? * Seeing the Big Picture, Communicating and Influencing etc ** Acceptable demonstration - adequate positive evidence provided *** Situation, Task, Action, Result
Scout wrote:Thanks a lot for this. When she's on to her next one I'll hopefully send something over to you. Much appreciated.lastant wrote:Would disagree with the Oxbridge comment personally, although that obviously depends on what department/area/grade you're looking to get into, but it certainly helps to be in the Civil Service to progress/move as there are plenty of jobs that are advertised internally across it. Knowing people can be useful in regards to networking and being aware of opportunities, but I'm not sure it's quite as 'old boy's club' as people might think and you'd be surprised at how open and fair the competition for posts is...I'm certainly yet to be given a nod and a wink in regards to easy progression and I'm into my seventeenth year of service! The How to Apply page of the Civil Service Careers website is worth reading through - when it comes to actually applying, every post will require an application that matches the behaviours selected as suitable for it*...as you've mentioned you'll need at least a 4 in each one** to progress past the sift. Is she following the STAR method***? You also need to get out of the habit of saying 'we', this is all about what you did to meet that example (I find that incredibly hard to do personally). In short, look at the Behaviours document and be sure that the examples you're providing match what they're looking for for each one. Can't promise miracles but am happy to have a look over examples if you want? * Seeing the Big Picture, Communicating and Influencing etc ** Acceptable demonstration - adequate positive evidence provided *** Situation, Task, Action, Result
afgavinstan wrote:Legionnaires disease prevention.
Hopefully it's intended for good. The cortana stuff I've seen has been reminding me that I check my emails to often, I don't reserve enough time in the day for focused work, and it tells me how many times I have successfully not allowed work to interfere with my down time. Maybe I'm naive but I'd like to think they have done this for the right reasons. Always the possibility that unscrupulous companies will miss use the data. Hopefully MS will restrict access to the data to the employee, not the employer.poprock wrote:… and almost certainly contravening a pile of EU employment laws.
GooberTheHat wrote:Hopefully it's intended for good. The cortana stuff I've seen has been reminding me that I check my emails to often, I don't reserve enough time in the day for focused work, and it tells me how many times I have successfully not allowed work to interfere with my down time. Maybe I'm naive but I'd like to think they have done this for the right reasons. Always the possibility that unscrupulous companies will miss use the data. Hopefully MS will restrict access to the data to the employee, not the employer.poprock wrote:… and almost certainly contravening a pile of EU employment laws.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!