Brooks wrote:For the record it turns out I've managed to start at Episode 4.
Hahaha. Brilliant! Wait till you see what you've missed. Ep4 is positively mainstream in comparison.Brooks wrote:For the record it turns out I've managed to start at Episode 4. Didn't bat an eye. Gorillavid
poprock wrote:Katpiss Evergreen, for fuck’s sake.
poprock wrote:Their silliness and child-like ‘cleverness’ are jarring … all have a logical reason behind them but fuck me, they sound awkward and ridiculous. The attempt at solemnity and cleverness in those names falls flat and feels ridiculous.
poprock wrote:Nah, that’s exactly what I’m talking about.
poprock wrote:Their silliness and child-like ‘cleverness’ are jarring … all have a logical reason behind them but fuck me, they sound awkward and ridiculous. The attempt at solemnity and cleverness in those names falls flat and feels ridiculous.
It’s this sort of thing that puts a lot of people off genre fiction of any kind. Change all the names to Kate, Bob, Natalie and Dave, and you’d remove a huge barrier to being taken seriously by mainstream readers/viewers.
Tempy wrote:It's not much worse than Skywalker or Han Solo or Obi Wan Kenobi or Jabba the Hutt (y'know, in my opinion) and Star Wars hasn't struggled.
poprock wrote:Tempy wrote:It's not much worse than Skywalker or Han Solo or Obi Wan Kenobi or Jabba the Hutt (y'know, in my opinion) and Star Wars hasn't struggled.
Daft names are easier to stomach in a galaxy far far away. It’s the mix of realism and high camp that often jars, for me. The naming feels juvenile and that’s heightened when the world built aims to be taken seriously.
mistercrayon wrote:The idle thumbs podcast made a nice observation. If you take any standard Indian curry name (e.g. Rogan Josh or aloo Gobi) it basically makes a plausible Star Wars name.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!