bad_hair_day wrote:The nearest sun to us has 'Goldilock' planets around it and that's just forty years travel based on our best propulsion.
Kow wrote:All those experiences people had of spaceships landing in their gardens, stopping their cars, flying slowly over their houses, city size craft slowly moving across the horizon, etc etc etc. They don't seem to happen so much anymore now that everyone has a camera with them all the time.
Yossarian wrote:bad_hair_day wrote:The nearest sun to us has 'Goldilock' planets around it and that's just forty years travel based on our best propulsion.
Forty years? You sure? I presume you’re talking about Alpha Centauri, which is over 4 light-years away. Are you saying that we can currently travel at 1/10th the speed of light?
bad_hair_day wrote:That's using a massive amount of money and unproven technology but yeah, quicker even. Have to be an extinction level reason to get a project like this even considered though. https://www.universetoday.com/15403/how-long-would-it-take-to-travel-to-the-nearest-star/Yossarian wrote:Forty years? You sure? I presume you’re talking about Alpha Centauri, which is over 4 light-years away. Are you saying that we can currently travel at 1/10th the speed of light?bad_hair_day wrote:The nearest sun to us has 'Goldilock' planets around it and that's just forty years travel based on our best propulsion.
dynamiteReady wrote:I go through phases, but generally now err the side of scepticism, because, being churlish about it, if we have encountered an alien race with technology and wisdom way beyond our own, you'd expect we'd be cattle by now.
But then perhaps we already are...
GooberTheHat wrote:I think we might find evidence that there was (basic) life on mars in the past, but not any now.
superflyninja wrote:All the derision and hostility by "proper scientists" of those excited by aliens etc is baffling.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!