The Star Wars thread - "Chewie, we're home."
  • bad_hair_day
    Show networks
    Twitter
    @_badhairday_
    Xbox
    Bad Hair Day
    PSN
    Bad-Hair-Day
    Steam
    badhairday247

    Send message
    Always brings a smile seeing the name Dredd, it reminds me of Gav's Stallone impersonation and the chorus of badgers chipping in.
    retroking1981: Fuck this place I'm off to the pub.
  • davyK
    Show networks
    Xbox
    davyK13
    Steam
    dbkelly

    Send message
    2000AD is such an untapped source.

    The last Dredd film I saw wasn't bad actually. But considering there's Strontium Dog, Robo Hunter, Flesh, Rogue Trooper, Black Hawk et al, an awful lot could be done with it.

    No Dan Dare either.
    Holding the wrong end of the stick since 2009.
  • Jones is in pre-prod with Rogue Trooper.
  • Yeah that could be good. Great source material, great director.
    That was awkward and unsettling, never post anything like it again.
  • EvilRedEye
    Show networks
    Twitter
    adrianongaming
    Xbox
    EvilRedEye8
    PSN
    EvilRedEye8
    Steam
    EvilRedEye8

    Send message
    It's really amazing how Disney have apparently managed to run Star Wars into the ground in just five years.
    "ERE's like Mr. Muscle, he loves the things he hates"
  • Funkstain wrote:
    TLF tries to introduce new dynamics, democratising the force a bit, maybe setting up exploration of multiple character arcs, moving away from "big bad guy with unclear motivations, redemption arc of sub-big bad guy, plucky heroes" stories, but it does it in such a clanging dragging bullshit way it alienated the fans and failed to take them on that journey So we're back to Abrams the hack trying to tie up loose ends and re-establishing the fan service ennui
    Why do you think TLJ democratised the force? To be honest I thought TFA did a good job of establishing some new characters and was a decent starting point, it wasnt perfect by any means. That movie had an extremely difficult job to do.

    TFA was absolutely fine. Very pretty, dynamic, and a big strength was the chemistry and warmth of most of the new characters. It was total fan service, with annoying mystery box story telling, and almost traced ANH from start to finish, but it was fine and good fun watch.

    Note on mystery box: there are ways of revealing a larger world without going LOOK LOOK AT THAT OOOOOH WHAT DOES IT MEAN. Discovery through characters appeals to me - one of the best examples I can think of is Lyra's journeys in His Dark Materials, which the BBC adaptation is mostly fucking up.

    ANYWAY The Last Jedi was an annoying and mostly boring film. So many issues: the stupid dropped call comedy routine opening, the dull chase, the casino. The new characters weren't great. The weird Leah force thing.

    But the potential and ambition was great! They dared to mock the universe's saviour! They revealed that the newest incarnation of that saviour was a nobody! They literally burned down almost all the mystery boxes! they had a truly interesting antagonist / protagonist relationship going... and they realised that endlessly retelling the exact same story about dark empire threatens everyone plucky heroes led by chosen one saves everyone with a bit of redemption thrown in gets BORING! so they had the bad guy say fuck this new order shit. it's bollocks! and they had Rey go "hmm Jedis, a bit problematic really" and they tried to show the force is not something that's like a cut-price lottery finger pointing at the latest Skywalker and shouting "IT'S YOOOUUU", it acts through all of us (kid and broomstick) and the new character (wossname) was badly scripted and acted but it was an attempt to say "look how this epic shit impacts the everyday maintenance person" or whatever the fuck she was. Also some parts of the movie were STUNNING

    So my point about TLJ is not that it's a great movie, but that what they were trying to do was at least different and moving the story in potentially new directions and JJ be like "NOOOO they want RotJ they shall get it!" and everyone is predictably bored as shit.
  • The gf made me sit through Lost so I know the perils of the JJ Mystery Box. But that was the only redeemable bit for me from TFA. The idea that there was a better, more interesting story there than the one we were getting. Tearing it up was probably the worst bit of TLJ. But I can understand how someone creative came in and was a bit uninspired by just remaking Empire Strikes Back with a BIG REVEAL and all the rest of it.
  • It was bigger than that, I think. The whole template was bullshit (ie: the same story exactly as was and will be evermore with some fancier lightsabre fights), so rip it up: no snoke/emperor, no empire vs rebels - what does dark side vs light side mean outside of those tropes? not just for these two protagonists trying to find their way, but the wider population?

    how does the rebellion survive its almost-annihilation? what kind of journey does Ren go on when he realises that the promises made by Snoke were empty and he murdered his father for them? Maybe he discovers something bigger about the meaning of his actions, his ambitions, his drive?

    Certainly it would help explain one of the most annoying mystery boxes: why does this kid training to be a Jedi decide to murder a bunch of kids and then his dad? It's no good doing a handwavey "oh dark side corrupts all", like the incomprehensible shift in Anakin in RotS
  • Funkstain wrote:
    It was bigger than that, I think. The whole template was bullshit (ie: the same story exactly as was and will be evermore with some fancier lightsabre fights), so rip it up: no snoke/emperor, no empire vs rebels - what does dark side vs light side mean outside of those tropes? not just for these two protagonists trying to find their way, but the wider population?

    how does the rebellion survive its almost-annihilation? what kind of journey does Ren go on when he realises that the promises made by Snoke were empty and he murdered his father for them? Maybe he discovers something bigger about the meaning of his actions, his ambitions, his drive?

    Certainly it would help explain one of the most annoying mystery boxes: why does this kid training to be a Jedi decide to murder a bunch of kids and then his dad? It's no good doing a handwavey "oh dark side corrupts all", like the incomprehensible shift in Anakin in RotS

    I don't see how this is any less of a 'mystery box' than we got in TFA. It's just random ideas and themes that come from no where and go nowhere...none of it is part of a larger story that was planned beyond that one film.

    I don't hate TLJ because it dared to have a different idea, i hate it cos they were badly implemented/didn't suit the existing narrative /required people acting out of character etc.
    The concept of Luke rejecting the force is interesting, but I'd bet very heavily that was not for one second part of the thinking for TFA...the way it was shoe horned in to TLJ i thought was totally out of character, and the resolution of Luke's story totally underwhelming and pointless in the wider scheme. However if it had been part of the larger trilogy story from the beginning it could have easily been done much more satisfactorily.

    This idea that TLJ is so unique and clever, and people just hate it cos it's not what they expected, is complete bobbins as far as I'm concerned.
    "Like i said, context is missing."
    http://ssgg.uk
  • Funkstain wrote:
    ANYWAY The Last Jedi was an annoying and mostly boring film. So many issues: the stupid dropped call comedy routine opening, the dull chase, the casino. The new characters weren't great. The weird Leah force thing. But the potential and ambition was great! They dared to mock the universe's saviour! They revealed that the newest incarnation of that saviour was a nobody! They literally burned down almost all the mystery boxes! they had a truly interesting antagonist / protagonist relationship going... and they realised that endlessly retelling the exact same story about dark empire threatens everyone plucky heroes led by chosen one saves everyone with a bit of redemption thrown in gets BORING! so they had the bad guy say fuck this new order shit. it's bollocks! and they had Rey go "hmm Jedis, a bit problematic really" and they tried to show the force is not something that's like a cut-price lottery finger pointing at the latest Skywalker and shouting "IT'S YOOOUUU", it acts through all of us (kid and broomstick) and the new character (wossname) was badly scripted and acted but it was an attempt to say "look how this epic shit impacts the everyday maintenance person" or whatever the fuck she was. Also some parts of the movie were STUNNING So my point about TLJ is not that it's a great movie, but that what they were trying to do was at least different and moving the story in potentially new directions and JJ be like "NOOOO they want RotJ they shall get it!" and everyone is predictably bored as shit.
    Re the kid and the broomstick, that was nothing new for me at all. I didnt see it as some big change. It was always a thing that the force is a part of everyone and everything. It was presented as some huge reveal but its just par for the course. Its not like the force was suddenly out of beta and finally on public release.

    Yep TLJ burned all the mystery boxes but replaced them with nothing at all. Less than nothing in my view cos he ruined Luke for me and stripped away pretty much all the SW magic.


    JJ was perfect for setting up the first movie and Id imagine Disney hoped better storytellers would come in and tie it all up in a nice bow. Its a mystery to me how Johnson's script got greenlit.

    Like Ram, I dont hate TLJ for trying to be different. I hate it cos it was incredibly badly written and put together.
    Look at Poe for example. In TFA Poe was a hotshot pilot, awesome action hero man, trusted by Leia to find Luke.
    In TLJ he makes shit yo momma jokes, disobeys direct orders and has his pants pulled down. His behaviour was not in keeping with TFA. (TJL set directly after TFA btw). But to what end? How did his character develop? Was this teardown of Poe worth it? IMO no. Not a single bit.
    Rose. What did she add? Nothing. A love interest for a redundant character. Oh and preaching about arms dealers and animal cruelty.
    Snoke, killed without a word of exposition. 
    Maybe TLJ does set up scope for stories outside the usual empire/rebels but it delivers nothing. 

    Im not having a go at you Funk at all btw.
    http://horganphoto.com My STILL under construction website
    PSN : superflyninja
  • b0r1s
    Show networks
    Xbox
    b0r1s
    PSN
    ib0r1s
    Steam
    ib0r1s

    Send message
    Funkstain wrote:
    Certainly it would help explain one of the most annoying mystery boxes: why does this kid training to be a Jedi decide to murder a bunch of kids and then his dad? It's no good doing a handwavey "oh dark side corrupts all", like the incomprehensible shift in Anakin in RotS

    Incomprehensible? Come on, those little Jedi younglings were basically begging to be slaughtered! Arrogant little shits.
  • Welp

    On how TLJ didn't mystery box things: the difference is, Abrams would point out things, make you look at things, that had no obvious explanation how they came to be, what they meant to the story, but made it clear they were important. TLJ told the story of its themes and ideas and killed the boxes, or at least as many as it could. You don't like those themes and ideas, yep cool that's fine.

    And yep trying to do his burn it all thing after the fan service of the first film was never going to make for anything less than a jarring experience, and you didn't like that again ok nice

    As for the idea you think is bobbins, I would think the same had it been expressed by me or I'd read it or something. It was ambitious but it dropped the ball. that's about as much as there is to it.

    Next:

    force is magic thing used by tiny amount of people under seriously controlled circumstances. for anyone to take real advantage of what it offers requires built-in sensitivity and years of training from youth, or outsize universe-level talent. this helps watchers identify with the hero on his journey - the amazingly talented but raw kid who saves the world. this is a good story and has been told millions of time. by making the force something more than a gift to your avatar and your avatar's enemy on screen it could be made more interesting, possibly. that's all.

    "ruining" Skywalker is the same as saying "ruining" your avatar, isn't it? I mean in "real" life people have problems and issues and fuck up and how they deal with that makes them more interesting to watch. What did you want, some kind of wise Yoda substitute? oh, right, of course! oops

    Anyway enough - I don't like TLJ to watch it again, whereas I've watched TFA a few times. I just appreciated very much what they were trying to do with TLJ, ultimately they didn't achieve it. I'm very disappointed (but not surprised) they reverted so hard to fan service / repetition with the third (apparently, guess we'll see) I also hope you guys enjoy it though

    why I'm typing to much about this btw is because it made me think of labour...TFA = this beige approximation of OG labour filled with "winners" and centrists; TLJ = the failed push into more radical territory; ROS = the potential reversion to confused imitation of a better party
  • monkey wrote:
    The gf made me sit through Lost so I know the perils of the JJ Mystery Box. But that was the only redeemable bit for me from TFA. The idea that there was a better, more interesting story there than the one we were getting. Tearing it up was probably the worst bit of TLJ. But I can understand how someone creative came in and was a bit uninspired by just remaking Empire Strikes Back with a BIG REVEAL and all the rest of it.

    it's funny I often think we're thought-adjacent

    the point I get from your post is that the imitation story NEEDED something better, more interesting than the one it was telling, so you'd accept the mystery boxes as at least the potential for that.


    My point interlaces with that (I agree TFA core story is boring cos it's the same, I agree the saga as a whole needs something new and interesting) and looks at the boxes differently: they are a lazy and sometimes catastrophic way of introducing interest, without doing the hard work with characters and story that allows for reveals as you go.

    Again His Dark Materials was superlative for this: Lyra's story starts off so small, so local - but everything she sees YOU see through her eyes, as her world gradually then rapidly expands: Oxford, London, Gyptians, the North, Other WORLDS! the gradually figured out mysteries of the alethiometer, daemons, dust...you figure these things out as the characters do. there's none of this frustrating feeling that others know far more than you do and you have to wait until they can be bothered to expose it to you with an AHA REVEAL mystery boxes are for lazy fuckers like abrams and internet nerds to argue about on forums
  • I cannot wait for my kids to read it
  • The biggest problem with TLJ is you can’t have a reasonable conversation about it.

    It is unique in a lot of ways. It’s a case study of what happens when you give an inoperable universe to a film maker with priors in upending ideas and conventions.

    It’s a mark of the absolute hubris Disney had when they bought the franchise and had fuck all idea what to do with, burnt the extended universe to the ground, and handed a trilogy to three different film makers.

    But - and all respect and apologies to Jedi here as I know he loves star wars and gets passionate about his dislike of this film- you just cannot talk about its successes and failures from different perspectives, and how they are based on the incredulous and nonsense phenomenon that is Star Wars and its unplanned universe, when the argument comes to down to the whole “Rose sucks!” “yo momma jokes!” “Luke is rubbish” angle.

    Cos all of that stuff works for a lot of people, many of them
    massive Star Wars fans, and I think the marmite reception it gets and the status given to Star Wars makes the actual
    interesting conversations about it impossible to have. Reminds me of trying to talk to Roujin about it. We had some productive back and forth, but so much of it was tangled up in very hard to unthread ideas.

    I think the inability to look past the visceral dislike of it and think about what it’s trying to do, and why even if that failed, it might have been valuable to do is far more interesting that just disregarding it.

    Essentially I think it broke Star Wars, not because it is bad, or because Star Wars is bad, but because the universe without the extended stuff is utterly bereft of any kind of consistently or depth, and trying to do something different* with it is impossible.

    As a minor example, I think taking Luke Skywalker - a character who is literally The Heroes Journey 101- and trying to tease that idea out into something different is a great idea. But Star Wars films seem to actively refuse that kind of experimentation.

    Anyway, I want to make it abundantly clear it’s totally fine to love it hate it, but I do think refusing to approach it with some kind of critical nuance misses an opportunity for discussion beyond “it bad, you dumb”

    *specifically talking about the main line films here - I think  they’re doomed to be the same story over and over

    Edit: just want to go completely out of my way to say that I don't think there isn't a point talking about whether it is a good or bad film, I just personally feel there's something a lot more interesting under the surface than that
  • It’s difficult to even know what a Star Wars is outside of being the same stuff over and over. The die was cast when return of the Jedi basically repeated the end of a new hope but with better graphics.

    I have an annoying question: why did people dislike Rey’s nothing lack of regal ancestry when the precedence was there for Anakin Skywalker?
  • acemuzzy
    Show networks
    PSN
    Acemuzzy
    Steam
    Acemuzzy (aka murray200)
    Wii
    3DS - 4613-7291-1486

    Send message
    So I just finished TLJ, my first viewing. Hmmmm. Lots going on, a real mix of fun/interesting/well shoot scenes, and total BS. So pretty unsatisfactory all in. BUT it's left me well hyped for tomorrow evening - let's hope this shit ends with a bang (*)!


    (*) not literal bang, pls
  • bad_hair_day
    Show networks
    Twitter
    @_badhairday_
    Xbox
    Bad Hair Day
    PSN
    Bad-Hair-Day
    Steam
    badhairday247

    Send message
    May the force be with you, but don't follow through.
    retroking1981: Fuck this place I'm off to the pub.
  • I'm back on Battlefront 2. Such a fun game for SW nerds.

    The free support is actually very impressive on this. They are still releasing maps and heroes at a semi-steady rate and just dropped a load of stuff to tie (pun) in with the new movie.
    There is a 20 quid DLC to get the new movie skins but it does unlock 350 skins total, many are clone trooper variants but £20 for that many cosmetics isn't bad and it is optional.


    I would love some Mando stuff, especially as Boba Fett doesn't have any alternate skins, not even a Jango skin.

    They dug deep into the cannon though, even the Clone Commandos are in. Unfortunately they seem to have dropped the Death Troopers in the process, seems odd to remove content.
  • EvilRedEye
    Show networks
    Twitter
    adrianongaming
    Xbox
    EvilRedEye8
    PSN
    EvilRedEye8
    Steam
    EvilRedEye8

    Send message
    Anakin wasn't a nobody, he was prophesied (IIRC) and his immaculate conception was manipulated by the Emperor. 

    I actually don't understand what is so great about a Force-wielding Star Wars hero being a nobody? The Force isn't real so the idea of it being democratic isn't really of much use.
    "ERE's like Mr. Muscle, he loves the things he hates"
  • A lot of the complaints were that Rey was teased as having lineage but then snoke said “nah”.
  • GooberTheHat
    Show networks
    Twitter
    GooberTheHat
    Xbox
    GooberTheHat
    Steam
    GooberTheHat

    Send message
    You can always trust a sith lord to tell the truth to a force sensitive person they are trying to manipulate. They are well known for their honesty.
  • You can always trust a sith lord to tell the truth to a force sensitive person they are trying to manipulate. They are well known for their honesty.
    Ha.
    Yeah I never took Snoke or Ren's version as gospel, could easily be changed without being obtuse.
  • EvilRedEye
    Show networks
    Twitter
    adrianongaming
    Xbox
    EvilRedEye8
    PSN
    EvilRedEye8
    Steam
    EvilRedEye8

    Send message
    TBH, my headcanon has always been that it wasn't the truth just because there's something weirdly anti-climactic about that scene? Like there's not enough drama about it for it to be a real revelation.
    "ERE's like Mr. Muscle, he loves the things he hates"
  • You make interesting points Tempy for sure.
    But believe it or not Im not a star wars uber geek. I couldnt tell you whether the Sarlacc pit was in ep 5 or 6.
    Johnson wanting to break the mold for SW is admirable. Maybe some movie down the line will capitalise on those beginnings and do something great.
    http://horganphoto.com My STILL under construction website
    PSN : superflyninja
  • Tempy wrote:
    The biggest problem with TLJ is you can’t have a reasonable conversation about it.

    I wanted to engage with this, been thinking about it a lot since reading earlier but i've been busy with work and it's getting late...so i'll try to avoid a lot of the points I wanted to rebut/raise that would just splinter into lots of different arguments and focus on one single point - Luke.

    You think they tried to tease the Luke Skywalker character into something different, and that deserves praise and consideration.

    I think Luke literally plays the role of Yoda in this fuzzy, oddly disguised remake of Empire. Our hero goes looking for a jedi master on a mysterious planet, hoping they will train them and helping them save the galaxy...instead they find a weird old grumpy git that initially refuses to train them. Eventually they relent, but talk about the more spiritual side, not the fighty fighty. Our hero is then drawn to a 'dark' cave where they experience a disturbing vision. Our hero then has a vision and decides they have to leave to go and have a fight with the evil dark helmet.
    I could rant on about Luke's 'reasons' for being that way, and then his final act, but let's leave that for another day.

    Instead, a different discussion/thought. I wonder how weird Yoda seems in Empire, to anyone that was raised on the prequels knowing he's the top jedi kick-ass mini-ninja?
    What was subversive, and brilliant, about Empire was Yoda not being the big fighty warrior you would expect...it sent the force in a totally different direction and is prob pretty key to the impact of the 'jedi concept' and success of star wars overall. but the prequels for me undermined that by making him into an action hero. and in TLJ, they kind of do the flip with Luke. Is that brilliant subversive film making? is it poetic, "cos it rhymes, it moves in circles"? Or are they just repeating the old film beats, but using the original cast in that role to draw in the old fans?
    "Like i said, context is missing."
    http://ssgg.uk
  • b0r1s
    Show networks
    Xbox
    b0r1s
    PSN
    ib0r1s
    Steam
    ib0r1s

    Send message
    Interesting point Ram. I never considered the Luke flip in TLJ, but subconsciously just enjoyed the scenes. It actually reinforces the fact that the new films are just playing beats of the originals in slightly different ways. TBH, I don’t mind that as long as the film itself is entertaining. Still don’t think TLJ had enough entertainment value.

    As for Yoda in the prequels it was one of the highlights for me amongst a lot of crap. The idea of a Jedi master at the height of his powers was a brilliant scene.
  • I’m going to bed so I can’t discuss in depth but the Yoda/TESB stuff hadn’t really occurred to me because of the prequels are a mire of shite and I don’t think Lucas really thought about coherency with the other films when writing them.

    But yes he does reprise the Yoda role, that’s interesting.

    Also last point: you’re putting words in my mouth: I never said it was wonderful or deserving of praise. I said I thought it was - great idea. I’m not sure it completely succeeds, but it’s rare you get to see a character learn from the wise goblin (or are least appear to be, the whole point seems to be that he doesn’t really become wise, at all) and then become it. Usually the story ends either side of it.

    Tried very hard to talk about what’s interesting about TLJ without coming down on either side of it and you end up going on about “is it brilliant film making” etc

    edit: i can’t sleep cos of my stupid fucking leg, so to further follow in:

    That’s not the point i’m raising, the point i’m raising is that Star Wars is busted as all hell and basically always has been. If you want a negative take on that: it’s Canto Bight. I have no issue with the time spent there, but the entire sequence is bereft of any meaning because SW cannot support that kind of “both sides are had cos they use weapons made by bad people” rhetoric. It makes no sense, there’s barely any presence.

    But please don’t drag the point I am making about there being things to discuss about the film into this whole absolutist angle where you need to rebut stuff. That’s circling straight back to the initial point I made.

    I’d talk more about the yoda/luke stuff but i am not trying to analyse the decisions in the film at a micro scale and whether they are good or bad, but how TLJ is the result of a lot of factors way beyond “a bad director” - largely how it’s tied into Disney’s endless avarice and the interestingly ramshackle and slipshod universe that was never designed to withstand this many attempts to revisit it.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!