Eric Idle wrote:He was the weirdest twat I ever met. There was never any doubt that he was a creepy predator, as he would take a caravan to his gigs.... The depths of his depravity however, surprised even me.
Liveinadive wrote:Is this new from last week? Last week the case against him was dropped due to insignificant evidence.
Liveinadive wrote:Is this new from last week? Last week the case against him was dropped due to insignificant evidence.
The police need more than rumours.dynamiteReady wrote:Yes. Pretty detailed stuff too. And I'm sure the CPS case contains much of the same shit we've read. But why aren't they pulling the trigger?
Kow wrote:If there's nothing that would hold up in court then he didn't clearly do anything.
Kow wrote:How can you feel someone did something if there's no evidence?
Liveinadive wrote:Watch the show I mentioned on All4.
Kow wrote:I don't have All4. It feels a bit tabloidy to believe someone did something without sufficient evidence.Watch the show I mentioned on All4.
It's a scientific fact. There's no real evidence for it, but it is scientific fact.Kow wrote:How can you feel someone did something if there's no evidence?
In sex abuse cases, especially high profile ones, it's quite common for the police to make the investigation public in the hopes that doing so will prompt further victims to come forward and thus strengthen the case against the accused. It's been a pretty standard tactic for all of these recent investigations.dynamiteReady wrote:It does, but it's also quite uncommon for the police to make their investigations so conspicuous. Especially when the subject is so famous...Kow wrote:I don't have All4. It feels a bit tabloidy to believe someone did something without sufficient evidence.Watch the show I mentioned on All4.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!